PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXQ.TO vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HXQ.TO is traded in CAD, while QTUM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTUM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXQ.TO achieves a 18.52% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 46.76% return.


HXQ.TO

1D
1.44%
1M
2.69%
YTD
18.52%
6M
15.98%
1Y
38.04%
3Y*
28.80%
5Y*
20.09%
10Y*
22.16%

QTUM

1D
3.53%
1M
11.11%
YTD
46.76%
6M
40.31%
1Y
84.47%
3Y*
50.61%
5Y*
31.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HXQ.TO
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF
18.52%15.05%35.98%51.16%-27.84%26.20%45.58%32.26%-13.38%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
46.76%30.41%63.29%36.54%-24.29%35.12%38.68%41.89%-16.27%

Correlation

The correlation between HXQ.TO and QTUM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018

0.71

The correlation between HXQ.TO and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXQ.TO
QTUM

Technology

55.9%
85.1%

Communication Services

15.8%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
0.7%

Healthcare

4.4%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Industrials

3.1%
8.7%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Energy

0.5%

-

Financial Services

0.3%

-

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Technology

HXQ.TO
55.9%
QTUM
85.1%

Communication Services

HXQ.TO
15.8%
QTUM
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HXQ.TO
13.2%
QTUM
0.7%

Healthcare

HXQ.TO
4.4%
QTUM
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

HXQ.TO
4.4%
QTUM

-

Industrials

HXQ.TO
3.1%
QTUM
8.7%

Utilities

HXQ.TO
1.4%
QTUM

-

Basic Materials

HXQ.TO
1.0%
QTUM

-

Energy

HXQ.TO
0.5%
QTUM

-

Financial Services

HXQ.TO
0.3%
QTUM

-

Real Estate

HXQ.TO
0.2%
QTUM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXQ.TO vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXQ.TO
HXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HXQ.TOQTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.48

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

6.12

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.84

21.04

-11.20

HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXQ.TO and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HXQ.TOQTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

3.04

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

1.15

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

1.04

+0.02

Drawdowns

HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -33.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXQ.TO and QTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXQ.TOQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.60%

-33.52%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-13.88%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-25.61%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.60%

-33.52%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-5.82%

+2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-7.36%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

4.03%

-0.15%

Volatility

HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) is 6.67%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 13.61%. This indicates that HXQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXQ.TOQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

13.61%

-6.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

22.69%

-9.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

27.96%

-11.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.85%

27.48%

-6.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.89%

27.98%

-7.09%

HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HXQ.TO
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.74%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


HXQ.TO and QTUM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.

HXQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QTUM is Technology Equities. HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Horizons and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXQ.TO and 0.40% for QTUM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXQ.TO and QTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer