HXQ.TO vs. QTUM
HXQ.TO (Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HXQ.TO returned 20.09%/yr vs 31.47%/yr for QTUM. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HXQ.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HXQ.TO is traded in CAD, while QTUM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTUM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXQ.TO achieves a 18.52% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 46.76% return.
HXQ.TO
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 18.52%
- 6M
- 15.98%
- 1Y
- 38.04%
- 3Y*
- 28.80%
- 5Y*
- 20.09%
- 10Y*
- 22.16%
QTUM
- 1D
- 3.53%
- 1M
- 11.11%
- YTD
- 46.76%
- 6M
- 40.31%
- 1Y
- 84.47%
- 3Y*
- 50.61%
- 5Y*
- 31.47%
- 10Y*
- —
HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 18.52% | 15.05% | 35.98% | 51.16% | -27.84% | 26.20% | 45.58% | 32.26% | -13.38% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 46.76% | 30.41% | 63.29% | 36.54% | -24.29% | 35.12% | 38.68% | 41.89% | -16.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXQ.TO and QTUM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018 | 0.71 |
The correlation between HXQ.TO and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXQ.TO
QTUM
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
HXQ.TO
QTUM
Communication Services
HXQ.TO
QTUM
Consumer Cyclical
HXQ.TO
QTUM
Healthcare
HXQ.TO
QTUM
Consumer Defensive
HXQ.TO
QTUM
-
Industrials
HXQ.TO
QTUM
Utilities
HXQ.TO
QTUM
-
Basic Materials
HXQ.TO
QTUM
-
Energy
HXQ.TO
QTUM
-
Financial Services
HXQ.TO
QTUM
-
Real Estate
HXQ.TO
QTUM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXQ.TO vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
HXQ.TO
QTUM
HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXQ.TO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.48 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 6.12 | -3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.84 | 21.04 | -11.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXQ.TO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 3.04 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 1.15 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 1.04 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -33.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXQ.TO and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXQ.TO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.60% | -33.52% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -13.88% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -25.61% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.60% | -33.52% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -5.82% | +2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -7.36% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 4.03% | -0.15% |
Volatility
HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) is 6.67%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 13.61%. This indicates that HXQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXQ.TO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 13.61% | -6.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.75% | 22.69% | -9.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 27.96% | -11.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 27.48% | -6.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.89% | 27.98% | -7.09% |
HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HXQ.TO vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.74% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HXQ.TO and QTUM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.
HXQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QTUM is Technology Equities. HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Horizons and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXQ.TO and 0.40% for QTUM.
Find the right allocation for HXQ.TO and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer