PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXH.TO vs. GLCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXH.TO achieves a 22.45% return, which is significantly higher than GLCC.TO's -5.15% return. Over the past 10 years, HXH.TO has underperformed GLCC.TO with an annualized return of 12.10%, while GLCC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.89% annualized return.


HXH.TO

1D
0.49%
1M
4.48%
YTD
22.45%
6M
23.40%
1Y
42.83%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
16.47%
10Y*
12.10%

GLCC.TO

1D
2.91%
1M
-6.20%
YTD
-5.15%
6M
-3.63%
1Y
48.60%
3Y*
40.00%
5Y*
20.22%
10Y*
13.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXH.TO
Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF
22.45%25.86%15.24%6.33%5.00%34.51%-7.66%22.17%-14.86%8.10%
GLCC.TO
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF
-5.15%137.43%20.18%6.19%-1.80%-9.38%15.00%38.71%-0.38%7.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HXH.TO and GLCC.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2016

0.11

The correlation between HXH.TO and GLCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.23 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HXH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXH.TO
GLCC.TO

Real Estate

32.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

HXH.TO
32.3%
GLCC.TO

-

Basic Materials

HXH.TO

-

GLCC.TO
100.0%

Communication Services

HXH.TO

-

GLCC.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

HXH.TO

-

GLCC.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

HXH.TO

-

GLCC.TO

-

Energy

HXH.TO

-

GLCC.TO

-

Financial Services

HXH.TO

-

GLCC.TO

-

Healthcare

HXH.TO

-

GLCC.TO

-

Industrials

HXH.TO

-

GLCC.TO

-

Technology

HXH.TO

-

GLCC.TO

-

Utilities

HXH.TO

-

GLCC.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXH.TO vs. GLCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXH.TO
HXH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
HXH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HXH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

GLCC.TO
GLCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HXH.TOGLCC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.14

1.23

+0.92

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.31

1.53

+15.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

53.84

4.34

+49.50

HXH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.30, which is higher than the GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXH.TO and GLCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HXH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXH.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.80%, smaller than the maximum GLCC.TO drawdown of -81.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXH.TO and GLCC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXH.TOGLCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.80%

-81.37%

+40.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.52%

-33.03%

+30.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.55%

-33.03%

+22.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.48%

-37.60%

+22.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.80%

-44.83%

+4.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-27.04%

+27.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-53.15%

+48.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

11.60%

-10.79%

Volatility

HXH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO) is 2.78%, while Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) has a volatility of 16.63%. This indicates that HXH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXH.TOGLCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

16.63%

-13.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.77%

35.94%

-29.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.25%

43.26%

-35.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.20%

32.35%

-20.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

32.16%

-16.10%

HXH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXH.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than GLCC.TO's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

HXH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HXH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLCC.TO
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF
9.12%6.01%10.30%11.16%10.08%6.31%6.47%4.58%5.62%7.08%8.75%2.32%
HXH.TO
Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HXH.TO and GLCC.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for GLCC.TO.

HXH.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while GLCC.TO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for HXH.TO and 0.79% for GLCC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXH.TO and GLCC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer