PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXF.TO achieves a 12.77% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 20.26% return.


HXF.TO

1D
1.77%
1M
5.72%
YTD
12.77%
6M
17.09%
1Y
43.33%
3Y*
30.46%
5Y*
17.45%
10Y*
14.83%

XDIV.TO

1D
0.91%
1M
3.66%
YTD
20.26%
6M
19.53%
1Y
40.50%
3Y*
23.53%
5Y*
16.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXF.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF
12.77%35.34%30.20%12.45%-9.00%35.14%1.80%21.45%-9.50%12.04%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF
20.26%24.92%19.56%11.71%0.29%32.25%-7.81%24.84%-10.04%8.48%

Correlation

The correlation between HXF.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between HXF.TO and XDIV.TO has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXF.TO
XDIV.TO

Financial Services

100.0%
46.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

28.8%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.3%

Utilities

-

11.3%

Financial Services

HXF.TO
100.0%
XDIV.TO
46.7%

Basic Materials

HXF.TO

-

XDIV.TO

-

Communication Services

HXF.TO

-

XDIV.TO
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HXF.TO

-

XDIV.TO
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

HXF.TO

-

XDIV.TO

-

Energy

HXF.TO

-

XDIV.TO
28.8%

Healthcare

HXF.TO

-

XDIV.TO

-

Industrials

HXF.TO

-

XDIV.TO

-

Real Estate

HXF.TO

-

XDIV.TO

-

Technology

HXF.TO

-

XDIV.TO
1.3%

Utilities

HXF.TO

-

XDIV.TO
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXF.TO
HXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
HXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

XDIV.TO
XDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HXF.TOXDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

2.09

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.44

17.45

-12.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.13

59.31

-37.18

HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.39, which is lower than the XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXF.TO and XDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HXF.TOXDIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39

5.17

-1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

1.59

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.82

+0.01

Drawdowns

HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.77%, roughly equal to the maximum XDIV.TO drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXF.TO and XDIV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXF.TOXDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.77%

-41.30%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.94%

-2.33%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.90%

-10.53%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.66%

-17.60%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

0.00%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-4.25%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

0.68%

+1.27%

Volatility

HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) at 2.81%. This indicates that HXF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXF.TOXDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

2.81%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

6.37%

+4.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

7.89%

+4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

10.53%

+3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

16.00%

+0.95%

HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXF.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

HXF.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXF.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF
3.26%3.81%4.29%4.20%3.95%3.58%4.58%4.02%4.85%1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


HXF.TO and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HXF.TO.

HXF.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. HXF.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index (Total Return), while XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXF.TO and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXF.TO and XDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer