HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO
HXF.TO (Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF) and XDIV.TO (iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXF.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index (Total Return), while XDIV.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HXF.TO returned 17.45%/yr vs 16.63%/yr for XDIV.TO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HXF.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for XDIV.TO.
Performance
HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXF.TO achieves a 12.77% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 20.26% return.
HXF.TO
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 12.77%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 43.33%
- 3Y*
- 30.46%
- 5Y*
- 17.45%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
XDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 20.26%
- 6M
- 19.53%
- 1Y
- 40.50%
- 3Y*
- 23.53%
- 5Y*
- 16.63%
- 10Y*
- —
HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXF.TO Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF | 12.77% | 35.34% | 30.20% | 12.45% | -9.00% | 35.14% | 1.80% | 21.45% | -9.50% | 12.04% |
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 20.26% | 24.92% | 19.56% | 11.71% | 0.29% | 32.25% | -7.81% | 24.84% | -10.04% | 8.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXF.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HXF.TO and XDIV.TO has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXF.TO
XDIV.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
HXF.TO
XDIV.TO
Basic Materials
HXF.TO
-
XDIV.TO
-
Communication Services
HXF.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HXF.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Consumer Defensive
HXF.TO
-
XDIV.TO
-
Energy
HXF.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Healthcare
HXF.TO
-
XDIV.TO
-
Industrials
HXF.TO
-
XDIV.TO
-
Real Estate
HXF.TO
-
XDIV.TO
-
Technology
HXF.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Utilities
HXF.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXF.TO
XDIV.TO
HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXF.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 2.09 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.44 | 17.45 | -12.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.13 | 59.31 | -37.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXF.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39 | 5.17 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 1.59 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.82 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.77%, roughly equal to the maximum XDIV.TO drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXF.TO and XDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXF.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.77% | -41.30% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.94% | -2.33% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.90% | -10.53% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.66% | -17.60% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | 0.00% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -4.25% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 0.68% | +1.27% |
Volatility
HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) at 2.81%. This indicates that HXF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXF.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 2.81% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.21% | 6.37% | +4.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.75% | 7.89% | +4.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 10.53% | +3.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 16.00% | +0.95% |
HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXF.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HXF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
HXF.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXF.TO Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 3.26% | 3.81% | 4.29% | 4.20% | 3.95% | 3.58% | 4.58% | 4.02% | 4.85% | 1.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HXF.TO and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HXF.TO.
HXF.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. HXF.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index (Total Return), while XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXF.TO and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXF.TO and XDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer