HXEM.TO vs. SOXL
HXEM.TO (Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXEM.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Global X Emerging Markets Futures Roll Index (Total Return), while SOXL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HXEM.TO returned 9.75%/yr vs 51.27%/yr for SOXL. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HXEM.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
HXEM.TO vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HXEM.TO is traded in CAD, while SOXL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SOXL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXEM.TO achieves a 28.95% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 539.11% return.
HXEM.TO
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 11.29%
- YTD
- 28.95%
- 6M
- 29.50%
- 1Y
- 56.68%
- 3Y*
- 24.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- —
SOXL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 112.10%
- YTD
- 539.11%
- 6M
- 467.23%
- 1Y
- 1,373.18%
- 3Y*
- 133.46%
- 5Y*
- 51.27%
- 10Y*
- 65.65%
HXEM.TO vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXEM.TO Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF | 28.95% | 26.46% | 14.53% | 7.09% | -16.39% | -2.71% | 12.33% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 575.97% | 47.80% | -4.77% | 219.78% | -84.64% | 116.86% | 79.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXEM.TO and SOXL is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2020 | 0.52 |
The correlation between HXEM.TO and SOXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HXEM.TO vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXEM.TO
SOXL
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
HXEM.TO
SOXL
-
Basic Materials
HXEM.TO
-
SOXL
-
Communication Services
HXEM.TO
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
HXEM.TO
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Defensive
HXEM.TO
-
SOXL
-
Energy
HXEM.TO
-
SOXL
-
Financial Services
HXEM.TO
-
SOXL
-
Healthcare
HXEM.TO
-
SOXL
-
Industrials
HXEM.TO
-
SOXL
-
Technology
HXEM.TO
-
SOXL
Utilities
HXEM.TO
-
SOXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXEM.TO vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
HXEM.TO
SOXL
HXEM.TO vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXEM.TO | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.72 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.61 | 32.73 | -28.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.65 | 111.07 | -94.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXEM.TO | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91 | 13.72 | -10.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.49 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.56 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
HXEM.TO vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, smaller than the maximum SOXL drawdown of -89.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXEM.TO and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXEM.TO | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.00% | -89.64% | +54.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.34% | -42.44% | +30.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.40% | -87.31% | +71.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.44% | -89.64% | +59.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | 0.00% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.75% | -33.94% | +20.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 12.48% | -9.07% |
Volatility
HXEM.TO vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO) is 8.38%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 40.78%. This indicates that HXEM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXEM.TO | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.38% | 40.78% | -32.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 80.69% | -63.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.60% | 101.48% | -81.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 105.46% | -88.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 97.19% | -80.24% |
HXEM.TO vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXEM.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HXEM.TO vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
HXEM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXEM.TO Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HXEM.TO and SOXL have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXEM.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXEM.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SOXL.
HXEM.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SOXL is Leveraged Equities. HXEM.TO tracks Global X Emerging Markets Futures Roll Index (Total Return), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXEM.TO and 0.75% for SOXL.
Find the right allocation for HXEM.TO and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer