PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXEM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXEM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO) and CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXEM.TO achieves a 28.95% return, which is significantly higher than BTCX-B.TO's -24.79% return.


HXEM.TO

1D
-0.87%
1M
11.29%
YTD
28.95%
6M
29.50%
1Y
56.68%
3Y*
24.44%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*

BTCX-B.TO

1D
-2.37%
1M
-16.88%
YTD
-24.79%
6M
-30.42%
1Y
-38.32%
3Y*
34.38%
5Y*
14.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXEM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HXEM.TO
Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF
28.95%26.46%14.53%7.09%-16.39%-5.40%
BTCX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units
-24.79%-11.32%139.01%149.40%-62.06%-16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between HXEM.TO and BTCX-B.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021

0.28

The correlation between HXEM.TO and BTCX-B.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXEM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXEM.TO
HXEM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HXEM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXEM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXEM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HXEM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXEM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCX-B.TO
BTCX-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXEM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO) and CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HXEM.TOBTCX-B.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

0.86

+0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.61

-0.76

+5.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.65

-1.32

+17.97

HXEM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXEM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXEM.TO and BTCX-B.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HXEM.TOBTCX-B.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

-0.90

+3.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.27

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.08

+0.57

Drawdowns

HXEM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, smaller than the maximum BTCX-B.TO drawdown of -75.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXEM.TO and BTCX-B.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXEM.TOBTCX-B.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-75.26%

+40.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.34%

-50.41%

+38.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.40%

-50.41%

+35.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.44%

-75.26%

+44.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-48.50%

+47.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.75%

-32.95%

+19.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

29.08%

-25.67%

Volatility

HXEM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO) is 8.38%, while CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) has a volatility of 9.83%. This indicates that HXEM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCX-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXEM.TOBTCX-B.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.38%

9.83%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

33.96%

-16.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.60%

42.89%

-23.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

54.13%

-37.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

54.99%

-38.04%

HXEM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXEM.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCX-B.TO's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

HXEM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HXEM.TO nor BTCX-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HXEM.TO and BTCX-B.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXEM.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXEM.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO.

HXEM.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BTCX-B.TO is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Global X and CI Global Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXEM.TO and 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXEM.TO and BTCX-B.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer