PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXE.TO vs. PPLN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXE.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF (PPLN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXE.TO achieves a 44.48% return, which is significantly higher than PPLN.TO's 29.04% return. Over the past 10 years, HXE.TO has outperformed PPLN.TO with an annualized return of 12.22%, while PPLN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.87% annualized return.


HXE.TO

1D
1.90%
1M
0.21%
YTD
44.48%
6M
43.26%
1Y
70.96%
3Y*
28.47%
5Y*
29.94%
10Y*
12.22%

PPLN.TO

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.16%
YTD
29.04%
6M
28.59%
1Y
39.15%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*
10.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXE.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXE.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF
44.48%17.30%14.39%3.95%53.52%81.48%-33.82%10.05%-26.98%-12.23%
PPLN.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF
29.04%4.14%17.18%8.45%16.63%33.83%-17.80%20.50%-11.54%-2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between HXE.TO and PPLN.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2014

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between HXE.TO and PPLN.TO has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXE.TO vs. PPLN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXE.TO
HXE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HXE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

PPLN.TO
PPLN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PPLN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPLN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPLN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PPLN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPLN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXE.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF (PPLN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HXE.TOPPLN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.47

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.55

3.85

+2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.78

10.25

+8.53

HXE.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is comparable to the PPLN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXE.TO and PPLN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HXE.TOPPLN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07

2.73

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.81

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.47

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.33

-0.12

Drawdowns

HXE.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXE.TO drawdown since its inception was -85.92%, which is greater than PPLN.TO's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXE.TO and PPLN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXE.TOPPLN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.92%

-59.05%

-26.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

-10.22%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.34%

-15.31%

-10.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.83%

-18.54%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.40%

-59.05%

-21.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.75%

-2.93%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.81%

-9.47%

-21.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

3.84%

-0.05%

Volatility

HXE.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF (PPLN.TO) at 5.77%. This indicates that HXE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPLN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXE.TOPPLN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.76%

5.77%

+3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.90%

11.56%

+7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.30%

14.40%

+8.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.24%

17.40%

+11.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.75%

23.20%

+10.55%

HXE.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXE.TO has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than PPLN.TO's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

HXE.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Dividend Comparison

HXE.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PPLN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HXE.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PPLN.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF
4.26%4.35%2.94%3.77%3.23%3.47%5.76%4.40%5.21%4.31%3.99%4.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


HXE.TO and PPLN.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXE.TO is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXE.TO is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for PPLN.TO.

HXE.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index (Total Return), while PPLN.TO tracks Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for HXE.TO and 0.31% for PPLN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXE.TO and PPLN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer