HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO
HXDM.TO (Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF) and HXH.TO (Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXDM.TO is a International Equity fund tracking the Global X EAFE Futures Roll Index (Total Return), while HXH.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canadian High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HXDM.TO returned 10.82%/yr vs 17.05%/yr for HXH.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HXDM.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for HXH.TO.
Performance
HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXDM.TO achieves a 12.68% return, which is significantly lower than HXH.TO's 24.46% return.
HXDM.TO
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 12.68%
- 1Y
- 24.37%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- —
HXH.TO
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 21.60%
- YTD
- 24.46%
- 1Y
- 42.39%
- 3Y*
- 23.26%
- 5Y*
- 17.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXDM.TO Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF | 12.68% | 24.06% | 11.07% | 15.09% | -8.78% | 10.16% | 4.59% | 15.19% | -8.61% |
HXH.TO Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF | 24.46% | 25.86% | 15.24% | 6.33% | 5.00% | 34.51% | -7.66% | 22.17% | -15.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXDM.TO and HXH.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2018 | 0.42 |
The correlation between HXDM.TO and HXH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXDM.TO
HXH.TO
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
HXDM.TO
HXH.TO
-
Industrials
HXDM.TO
HXH.TO
-
Healthcare
HXDM.TO
HXH.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
HXDM.TO
HXH.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HXDM.TO
HXH.TO
-
Technology
HXDM.TO
HXH.TO
-
Basic Materials
HXDM.TO
HXH.TO
-
Communication Services
HXDM.TO
HXH.TO
-
Utilities
HXDM.TO
HXH.TO
-
Energy
HXDM.TO
HXH.TO
-
Real Estate
HXDM.TO
HXH.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXDM.TO
HXH.TO
HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO) and Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HXDM.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 2.06 | -0.77 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 16.87 | -14.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.14 | 50.86 | -42.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXDM.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, smaller than the maximum HXH.TO drawdown of -40.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXDM.TO and HXH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXDM.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.43% | -40.80% | +12.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.40% | -2.52% | -8.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.65% | -10.55% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.87% | -15.48% | -8.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | 0.00% | -2.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.78% | -4.81% | +0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 0.84% | +2.16% |
Volatility
HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO) at 2.56%. This indicates that HXDM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXDM.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 2.56% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.45% | 6.63% | +6.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 8.45% | +7.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 12.16% | +2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 16.01% | -0.58% |
HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXDM.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than HXH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HXDM.TO nor HXH.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HXDM.TO and HXH.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HXDM.TO.
HXDM.TO is categorized as International Equity, while HXH.TO is Canada Equities. HXDM.TO tracks Global X EAFE Futures Roll Index (Total Return), while HXH.TO tracks Solactive Canadian High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HXDM.TO and 0.11% for HXH.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXDM.TO and HXH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer