PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO) and Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXDM.TO achieves a 12.68% return, which is significantly lower than HXH.TO's 24.46% return.


HXDM.TO

1D
0.32%
1M
0.52%
6M
7.52%
YTD
12.68%
1Y
24.37%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*

HXH.TO

1D
0.63%
1M
2.14%
6M
21.60%
YTD
24.46%
1Y
42.39%
3Y*
23.26%
5Y*
17.05%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HXDM.TO
Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF
12.68%24.06%11.07%15.09%-8.78%10.16%4.59%15.19%-8.61%
HXH.TO
Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF
24.46%25.86%15.24%6.33%5.00%34.51%-7.66%22.17%-15.68%

Correlation

The correlation between HXDM.TO and HXH.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2018

0.42

The correlation between HXDM.TO and HXH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXDM.TO
HXH.TO

Financial Services

16.0%

-

Industrials

14.7%

-

Healthcare

14.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

11.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Technology

8.8%

-

Basic Materials

7.5%

-

Communication Services

6.2%

-

Utilities

3.9%

-

Energy

3.4%

-

Real Estate

3.1%
32.3%

Financial Services

HXDM.TO
16.0%
HXH.TO

-

Industrials

HXDM.TO
14.7%
HXH.TO

-

Healthcare

HXDM.TO
14.4%
HXH.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

HXDM.TO
11.8%
HXH.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

HXDM.TO
10.2%
HXH.TO

-

Technology

HXDM.TO
8.8%
HXH.TO

-

Basic Materials

HXDM.TO
7.5%
HXH.TO

-

Communication Services

HXDM.TO
6.2%
HXH.TO

-

Utilities

HXDM.TO
3.9%
HXH.TO

-

Energy

HXDM.TO
3.4%
HXH.TO

-

Real Estate

HXDM.TO
3.1%
HXH.TO
32.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXDM.TO
HXDM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HXDM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXDM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXDM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HXDM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXDM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

HXH.TO
HXH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
HXH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HXH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO) and Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HXDM.TOHXH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

2.06

-0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

16.87

-14.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.14

50.86

-42.72

HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXDM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the HXH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXDM.TO and HXH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXDM.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, smaller than the maximum HXH.TO drawdown of -40.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXDM.TO and HXH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXDM.TOHXH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.43%

-40.80%

+12.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-2.52%

-8.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.65%

-10.55%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.87%

-15.48%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

0.00%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-4.81%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

0.84%

+2.16%

Volatility

HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO) at 2.56%. This indicates that HXDM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXDM.TOHXH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

2.56%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

6.63%

+6.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.64%

8.45%

+7.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.25%

12.16%

+2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.43%

16.01%

-0.58%

HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXDM.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than HXH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HXDM.TO vs. HXH.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HXDM.TO nor HXH.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HXDM.TO and HXH.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HXDM.TO.

HXDM.TO is categorized as International Equity, while HXH.TO is Canada Equities. HXDM.TO tracks Global X EAFE Futures Roll Index (Total Return), while HXH.TO tracks Solactive Canadian High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HXDM.TO and 0.11% for HXH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXDM.TO and HXH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer