HWWA.L vs. PRWU.L
HWWA.L (HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF) and PRWU.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from HSBC and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HWWA.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRWU.L.
Performance
HWWA.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HWWA.L is traded in GBP, while PRWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRWU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
HWWA.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 14.08%
- 6M
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 34.98%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- 13.41%
PRWU.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HWWA.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWWA.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF | 14.08% | 16.74% | 17.83% | 15.71% | 2.07% |
PRWU.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.63% | 18.25% | 1.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between HWWA.L and PRWU.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022 | 0.61 |
The correlation between HWWA.L and PRWU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
HWWA.L vs. PRWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HWWA.L
PRWU.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
HWWA.L
PRWU.L
Financial Services
HWWA.L
PRWU.L
Industrials
HWWA.L
PRWU.L
Communication Services
HWWA.L
PRWU.L
Consumer Cyclical
HWWA.L
PRWU.L
Basic Materials
HWWA.L
PRWU.L
Healthcare
HWWA.L
PRWU.L
Energy
HWWA.L
PRWU.L
Utilities
HWWA.L
PRWU.L
Consumer Defensive
HWWA.L
PRWU.L
Real Estate
HWWA.L
PRWU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HWWA.L vs. PRWU.L — Risk / Return Rank
HWWA.L
PRWU.L
HWWA.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWWA.L | PRWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.16 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.78 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWWA.L | PRWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | — | — |
Drawdowns
HWWA.L vs. PRWU.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWWA.L | PRWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | — | — |
Volatility
HWWA.L vs. PRWU.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HWWA.L | PRWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.26% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.69% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.33% | — | — |
HWWA.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWWA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HWWA.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison
HWWA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, while PRWU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWWA.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF | 1.29% | 1.43% | 1.58% | 1.95% | 2.07% | 1.48% | 1.45% | 2.07% | 2.10% | 1.86% | 1.71% | 1.97% |
PRWU.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HWWA.L and PRWU.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRWU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRWU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HWWA.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HWWA.L and 0.05% for PRWU.L.
Find the right allocation for HWWA.L and PRWU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer