PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HWWA.L vs. ISWD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HWWA.L vs. ISWD.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HWWA.L (HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF) and ISWD.L (iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Global Equities funds - HWWA.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while ISWD.L tracks the MSCI World Islamic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HWWA.L returned 13.41%/yr vs 12.78%/yr for ISWD.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HWWA.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ISWD.L.

Performance

HWWA.L vs. ISWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HWWA.L is traded in GBP, while ISWD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ISWD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWWA.L achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly lower than ISWD.L's 20.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HWWA.L having a 13.41% annualized return and ISWD.L not far behind at 12.78%.

HWWA.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
6.39%
YTD
14.08%
6M
15.66%
1Y
34.98%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
13.41%

ISWD.L

1D
0.65%
1M
11.25%
YTD
20.37%
6M
20.71%
1Y
38.83%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
13.73%
10Y*
12.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWWA.L vs. ISWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWWA.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF		14.08%16.74%17.83%15.71%-7.83%21.70%11.03%18.57%-5.55%12.89%
ISWD.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		20.37%11.58%7.85%17.25%-0.87%23.70%5.11%17.98%-3.81%9.22%

Correlation

The correlation between HWWA.L and ISWD.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2014

0.91

The correlation between HWWA.L and ISWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

HWWA.L vs. ISWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HWWA.L
ISWD.L

Technology

34.2%
42.8%

Financial Services

14.0%
0.0%

Industrials

13.2%
12.9%

Communication Services

8.4%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
6.9%

Basic Materials

5.8%
9.6%

Healthcare

5.6%
10.4%

Energy

4.2%
11.6%

Utilities

2.5%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.4%
0.2%

Technology

HWWA.L
34.2%
ISWD.L
42.8%

Financial Services

HWWA.L
14.0%
ISWD.L
0.0%

Industrials

HWWA.L
13.2%
ISWD.L
12.9%

Communication Services

HWWA.L
8.4%
ISWD.L
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HWWA.L
8.3%
ISWD.L
6.9%

Basic Materials

HWWA.L
5.8%
ISWD.L
9.6%

Healthcare

HWWA.L
5.6%
ISWD.L
10.4%

Energy

HWWA.L
4.2%
ISWD.L
11.6%

Utilities

HWWA.L
2.5%
ISWD.L
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

HWWA.L
2.2%
ISWD.L
3.7%

Real Estate

HWWA.L
1.4%
ISWD.L
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF

iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Often compared with HWWA.L:
HWWA.L vs. GERD.DEHWWA.L vs. JMOMHWWA.L vs. JPGL.LHWWA.L vs. MFDXHWWA.L vs. HMWO.LHWWA.L vs. IWFQ.LHWWA.L vs. IWDA.L
Often compared with ISWD.L:
ISWD.L vs. IGDA.LISWD.L vs. SPUSISWD.L vs. HLALISWD.L vs. VOOISWD.L vs. SPWOISWD.L vs. UMMAISWD.L vs. HIWS.L

Return for Risk

HWWA.L vs. ISWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HWWA.L
HWWA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
ISWD.L
ISWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ISWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWWA.L vs. ISWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HWWA.LISWD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.41
3.42

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.64
4.60

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.63

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.16

7.02

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.78

24.08

-2.30

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HWWA.L vs. ISWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is comparable to the ISWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWWA.L and ISWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HWWA.LISWD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41

3.42

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.03

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.89

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.74

+0.09

Drawdowns

HWWA.L vs. ISWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWWA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.12%, smaller than the maximum ISWD.L drawdown of -31.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWWA.L and ISWD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HWWA.LISWD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.12%

-31.52%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.74%

-5.51%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.79%

-21.00%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.79%

-21.00%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.12%

-24.90%

-0.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-3.61%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.61%

-0.01%

Volatility

HWWA.L vs. ISWD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) is 3.43%, while iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that HWWA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HWWA.LISWD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

3.64%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

8.40%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.26%

11.34%

-1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.69%

13.27%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

14.33%

0.00%

HWWA.L vs. ISWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWWA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ISWD.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

HWWA.L vs. ISWD.L - Dividend Comparison

HWWA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than ISWD.L's 1.27% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HWWA.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF		1.29%1.43%1.58%1.95%2.07%1.48%1.45%2.07%2.10%1.86%1.71%1.97%
ISWD.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		1.27%1.50%1.74%1.99%2.43%1.98%1.88%2.37%2.39%2.09%2.09%2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

HWWA.L and ISWD.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HWWA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HWWA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISWD.L.

HWWA.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ISWD.L tracks MSCI World Islamic Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HWWA.L and 0.60% for ISWD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWWA.L and ISWD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer