HWWA.L vs. HDGB.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

HWWA.L (HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF) and HDGB.L (VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - HWWA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while HDGB.L is a Hydrogen Economy fund tracking the MVIS Global Hydrogen Economy ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HWWA.L returned 11.87%/yr vs -12.94%/yr for HDGB.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HWWA.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for HDGB.L.

Performance

HWWA.L vs. HDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWWA.L achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly lower than HDGB.L's 32.72% return.

HWWA.L

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -2.07%
• 6M: 9.19%
• YTD: 11.91%
• 1Y: 25.65%
• 3Y*: 18.71%
• 5Y*: 11.87%
• 10Y*: 12.03%

HDGB.L

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: -13.74%
• 6M: 14.76%
• YTD: 32.72%
• 1Y: 55.48%
• 3Y*: -8.38%
• 5Y*: -12.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWWA.L vs. HDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HWWA.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF	11.91%	16.74%	17.80%	15.75%	-7.86%	14.58%
HDGB.L VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	32.72%	10.07%	-28.93%	-27.71%	-31.76%	-20.01%

Correlation

The correlation between HWWA.L and HDGB.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2021	0.55

The correlation between HWWA.L and HDGB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HWWA.L vs. HDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWWA.L

HWWA.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
HWWA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
HWWA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
HWWA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
HWWA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

HDGB.L

HDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 49
HDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
HDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
HDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 50
HDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
HDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWWA.L vs. HDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HWWA.L	HDGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	1.41	+0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	2.08	+1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.24	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.78	1.81	+1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.74	4.15	+10.60

HWWA.L vs. HDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the HDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWWA.L and HDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HWWA.L vs. HDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWWA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.15%, smaller than the maximum HDGB.L drawdown of -80.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWWA.L and HDGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HWWA.L	HDGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.15%	-80.00%	+54.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.76%	-30.53%	+23.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.79%	-63.35%	+46.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.79%	-80.00%	+63.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.99%	-59.70%	+56.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-51.61%	+48.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	13.34%	-11.60%

Volatility

HWWA.L vs. HDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) is 3.49%, while VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HDGB.L) has a volatility of 10.38%. This indicates that HWWA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HWWA.L	HDGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	10.38%	-6.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.84%	27.41%	-18.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.03%	39.12%	-28.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.82%	34.53%	-21.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.28%	34.61%	-20.33%

HWWA.L vs. HDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWWA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGB.L's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

HWWA.L vs. HDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

HWWA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, while HDGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HDGB.L VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HWWA.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF	1.32%	1.43%	1.58%	1.95%	2.07%	1.48%	1.45%	2.07%	2.10%	1.86%	1.71%	1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HWWA.L and HDGB.L in my portfolio?

HWWA.L and HDGB.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HWWA.L or HDGB.L?

On fees, HWWA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HWWA.L or HDGB.L?

HWWA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for HDGB.L.

What is the main difference between HWWA.L and HDGB.L?

HWWA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while HDGB.L is Hydrogen Economy. HWWA.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while HDGB.L tracks MVIS Global Hydrogen Economy ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HWWA.L and 0.55% for HDGB.L.