PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWTIX vs. LZISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWTIX vs. LZISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley International Small Cap Diversified Value Fund (HWTIX) and Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWTIX achieves a 9.76% return, which is significantly lower than LZISX's 27.20% return.


HWTIX

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.46%
YTD
9.76%
6M
13.72%
1Y
24.02%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*

LZISX

1D
-0.37%
1M
4.02%
YTD
27.20%
6M
30.51%
1Y
40.82%
3Y*
19.91%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
7.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWTIX vs. LZISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HWTIX
Hotchkis & Wiley International Small Cap Diversified Value Fund
9.76%30.96%4.62%20.79%-8.67%16.22%34.26%
LZISX
Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio
27.20%35.95%-3.68%11.59%-26.34%12.36%25.49%

Correlation

The correlation between HWTIX and LZISX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2020

0.87

The correlation between HWTIX and LZISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWTIX vs. LZISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWTIX
HWTIX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
HWTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
HWTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

LZISX
LZISX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
LZISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZISX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LZISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZISX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWTIX vs. LZISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley International Small Cap Diversified Value Fund (HWTIX) and Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HWTIXLZISXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.01

2.26

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.86

3.01

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

3.62

-1.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.63

14.12

-5.49

HWTIX vs. LZISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the LZISX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWTIX and LZISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HWTIXLZISXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.26

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.36

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.44

+0.36

Drawdowns

HWTIX vs. LZISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWTIX drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum LZISX drawdown of -65.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWTIX and LZISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWTIXLZISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.57%

-65.43%

+35.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.75%

-12.10%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.57%

-15.96%

-13.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.57%

-42.01%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.52%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.36%

-14.79%

+8.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

3.10%

-0.12%

Volatility

HWTIX vs. LZISX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley International Small Cap Diversified Value Fund (HWTIX) is 2.81%, while Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that HWTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LZISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWTIXLZISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

6.29%

-3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

15.49%

-5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

19.14%

-6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.91%

17.53%

+5.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.99%

17.06%

+4.93%

HWTIX vs. LZISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWTIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than LZISX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWTIX vs. LZISX - Dividend Comparison

HWTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than LZISX's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HWTIX
Hotchkis & Wiley International Small Cap Diversified Value Fund
4.26%4.68%31.95%6.64%5.32%22.94%4.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LZISX
Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio
1.50%1.91%1.89%2.08%5.44%36.78%2.07%2.10%4.62%0.00%2.96%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWTIX and LZISX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LZISX has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to HWTIX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWTIX dropped -29.57% vs LZISX's -65.43%.

LZISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWTIX and LZISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer