HWSIX vs. BRUSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) and Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund (BRUSX).
HWSIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Sep 20, 1985. BRUSX is managed by Bridgeway. It was launched on Aug 5, 1994.
Performance
HWSIX vs. BRUSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWSIX vs. BRUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund | 7.19% | 1.60% | 5.00% | 18.85% | 2.97% | 35.54% | -0.31% | 20.54% | -15.03% | 7.66% |
BRUSX Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund | -6.03% | 7.13% | 17.57% | 18.14% | -10.99% | 13.85% | 33.43% | 9.52% | -15.77% | 3.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWSIX achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly higher than BRUSX's -6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, HWSIX has outperformed BRUSX with an annualized return of 10.01%, while BRUSX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.70% annualized return.
HWSIX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 5.71%
- 1Y
- 16.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
BRUSX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- -6.03%
- 6M
- -8.04%
- 1Y
- 15.35%
- 3Y*
- 10.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.10%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWSIX vs. BRUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWSIX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than BRUSX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWSIX vs. BRUSX — Risk / Return Rank
HWSIX
BRUSX
HWSIX vs. BRUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) and Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund (BRUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWSIX | BRUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 0.58 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 0.95 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.12 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 0.78 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.44 | 2.21 | +1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWSIX | BRUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.58 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.09 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.33 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.49 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWSIX and BRUSX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWSIX vs. BRUSX - Dividend Comparison
HWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than BRUSX's 11.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund | 0.94% | 1.01% | 8.35% | 1.90% | 13.44% | 0.36% | 0.80% | 4.89% | 9.84% | 5.07% | 0.41% | 11.78% |
BRUSX Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund | 11.23% | 10.56% | 2.46% | 4.97% | 18.41% | 7.70% | 1.53% | 1.14% | 13.87% | 1.99% | 1.12% | 1.03% |
Drawdowns
HWSIX vs. BRUSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWSIX drawdown since its inception was -72.00%, which is greater than BRUSX's maximum drawdown of -60.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWSIX and BRUSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWSIX | BRUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.00% | -60.38% | -11.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -14.33% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.92% | -39.83% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.67% | -55.77% | +2.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -12.20% | +9.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -13.61% | +1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 5.06% | -0.64% |
Volatility
HWSIX vs. BRUSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) is 4.15%, while Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund (BRUSX) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that HWSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWSIX | BRUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 6.39% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | 15.33% | -2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.97% | 24.80% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 23.39% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 23.28% | +1.39% |