HWSAX vs. FRVLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) and Franklin Small Cap Value Fund (FRVLX).
HWSAX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jun 10, 2000. FRVLX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Mar 11, 1996.
Performance
HWSAX vs. FRVLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWSAX vs. FRVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 9.00% | 1.38% | 4.77% | 18.56% | 2.81% | 35.32% | -0.50% | 20.26% | -15.23% | 7.39% |
FRVLX Franklin Small Cap Value Fund | 4.47% | 7.36% | 13.16% | 12.81% | -10.25% | 22.51% | 5.45% | 26.08% | -12.92% | 9.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWSAX achieves a 9.00% return, which is significantly higher than FRVLX's 4.47% return. Over the past 10 years, HWSAX has outperformed FRVLX with an annualized return of 9.96%, while FRVLX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.39% annualized return.
HWSAX
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 18.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
FRVLX
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -6.87%
- YTD
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- 19.62%
- 3Y*
- 11.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWSAX vs. FRVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWSAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FRVLX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWSAX vs. FRVLX — Risk / Return Rank
HWSAX
FRVLX
HWSAX vs. FRVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) and Franklin Small Cap Value Fund (FRVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWSAX | FRVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 0.87 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 1.35 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.33 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.34 | 4.57 | -0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWSAX | FRVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.87 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.25 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.41 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.41 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWSAX and FRVLX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWSAX vs. FRVLX - Dividend Comparison
HWSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than FRVLX's 7.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 0.64% | 0.69% | 8.19% | 1.79% | 13.39% | 0.22% | 0.63% | 4.62% | 9.45% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 11.67% |
FRVLX Franklin Small Cap Value Fund | 7.65% | 7.99% | 8.45% | 4.54% | 3.21% | 7.55% | 2.20% | 6.31% | 18.48% | 8.06% | 4.76% | 11.04% |
Drawdowns
HWSAX vs. FRVLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWSAX drawdown since its inception was -72.14%, which is greater than FRVLX's maximum drawdown of -60.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWSAX and FRVLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWSAX | FRVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.14% | -60.27% | -11.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -14.98% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.98% | -25.09% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.82% | -44.10% | -9.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -9.25% | +8.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.03% | -10.36% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 4.35% | +0.08% |
Volatility
HWSAX vs. FRVLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) is 4.45%, while Franklin Small Cap Value Fund (FRVLX) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that HWSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWSAX | FRVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 6.55% | -2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | 13.28% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.99% | 23.37% | +0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 21.57% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.65% | 22.76% | +1.89% |