PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRVLX vs. MLAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRVLX vs. MLAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Small Cap Value Fund (FRVLX) and MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRVLX achieves a 19.28% return, which is significantly higher than MLAAX's 6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FRVLX has underperformed MLAAX with an annualized return of 10.30%, while MLAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.26% annualized return.


FRVLX

1D
1.30%
1M
3.80%
YTD
19.28%
6M
16.81%
1Y
35.96%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
10.30%

MLAAX

1D
1.86%
1M
3.10%
YTD
6.03%
6M
5.19%
1Y
15.52%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
17.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRVLX vs. MLAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRVLX
Franklin Small Cap Value Fund
19.28%7.36%13.16%12.81%-10.25%22.51%5.45%26.08%-12.92%9.91%
MLAAX
MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund
6.03%14.20%28.95%43.10%-31.51%25.00%36.95%33.18%3.81%32.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FRVLX and MLAAX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 1996

0.70

The correlation between FRVLX and MLAAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRVLX vs. MLAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRVLX
FRVLX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FRVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FRVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

MLAAX
MLAAX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MLAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MLAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRVLX vs. MLAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Small Cap Value Fund (FRVLX) and MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRVLXMLAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.16

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

0.75

+2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

2.18

+7.90

FRVLX vs. MLAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRVLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the MLAAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRVLX and MLAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRVLX vs. MLAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRVLX drawdown since its inception was -60.27%, smaller than the maximum MLAAX drawdown of -83.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRVLX and MLAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRVLXMLAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.27%

-83.01%

+22.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.04%

-20.28%

+8.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.09%

-35.43%

+10.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.09%

-39.36%

+14.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.10%

-39.36%

-4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-4.27%

+4.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-38.75%

+28.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

6.98%

-3.39%

Volatility

FRVLX vs. MLAAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Small Cap Value Fund (FRVLX) is 5.13%, while MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that FRVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRVLXMLAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

7.73%

-2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.03%

14.10%

-1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.57%

17.77%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.57%

25.74%

-4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.84%

25.79%

-2.95%

FRVLX vs. MLAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRVLX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MLAAX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRVLX vs. MLAAX - Dividend Comparison

FRVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, less than MLAAX's 22.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRVLX
Franklin Small Cap Value Fund
6.70%7.99%8.45%4.54%3.21%7.55%2.20%6.31%18.48%8.06%4.76%11.04%
MLAAX
MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund
22.99%24.37%22.54%10.59%14.95%26.64%5.40%11.55%23.59%17.20%13.18%13.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRVLX and MLAAX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLAAX has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to FRVLX (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRVLX dropped -60.27% vs MLAAX's -83.01%.

FRVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRVLX and MLAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer