HWSAX vs. CSMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX).
HWSAX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jun 10, 2000. CSMIX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jul 25, 1986.
Performance
HWSAX vs. CSMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWSAX vs. CSMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 7.13% | 1.38% | 4.77% | 18.56% | 2.81% | 35.32% | -0.50% | 20.26% | -15.23% | 7.39% |
CSMIX Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I | -1.68% | 14.65% | 8.66% | 21.42% | -8.87% | 28.95% | 7.82% | 21.01% | -18.37% | 13.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWSAX achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly higher than CSMIX's -1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, HWSAX has underperformed CSMIX with an annualized return of 9.77%, while CSMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.52% annualized return.
HWSAX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- 16.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
CSMIX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -7.18%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 22.20%
- 3Y*
- 13.53%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWSAX vs. CSMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWSAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than CSMIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWSAX vs. CSMIX — Risk / Return Rank
HWSAX
CSMIX
HWSAX vs. CSMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWSAX | CSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 0.97 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | 1.48 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.19 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 1.28 | -0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.37 | 4.63 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWSAX | CSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 0.97 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.35 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.44 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWSAX and CSMIX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWSAX vs. CSMIX - Dividend Comparison
HWSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than CSMIX's 14.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 0.65% | 0.69% | 8.19% | 1.79% | 13.39% | 0.22% | 0.63% | 4.62% | 9.45% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 11.67% |
CSMIX Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I | 14.47% | 14.23% | 6.67% | 7.57% | 6.02% | 13.34% | 0.50% | 3.58% | 9.79% | 11.56% | 11.58% | 12.73% |
Drawdowns
HWSAX vs. CSMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWSAX drawdown since its inception was -72.14%, which is greater than CSMIX's maximum drawdown of -53.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWSAX and CSMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWSAX | CSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.14% | -53.37% | -18.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -14.79% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.98% | -25.98% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.82% | -48.42% | -5.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -10.23% | +7.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.03% | -8.95% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 4.09% | +0.34% |
Volatility
HWSAX vs. CSMIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) is 4.15%, while Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that HWSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWSAX | CSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 5.43% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | 12.70% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.98% | 22.51% | +1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 21.57% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 23.92% | +0.72% |