HWNIX vs. TBGVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley International Value Fund (HWNIX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX).
HWNIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Dec 30, 2015. TBGVX is managed by Tweedy, Browne. It was launched on Jun 14, 1993.
Performance
HWNIX vs. TBGVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWNIX vs. TBGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWNIX Hotchkis & Wiley International Value Fund | 1.76% | 41.40% | 5.92% | 22.98% | -5.40% | 18.12% | -2.36% | 20.53% | -18.77% | 18.13% |
TBGVX Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund | 3.44% | 23.86% | 2.47% | 12.48% | -7.52% | 15.62% | -1.00% | 14.64% | -6.72% | 15.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWNIX achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly lower than TBGVX's 3.44% return. Over the past 10 years, HWNIX has outperformed TBGVX with an annualized return of 10.14%, while TBGVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.70% annualized return.
HWNIX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- 29.07%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
TBGVX
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- 19.21%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWNIX vs. TBGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWNIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TBGVX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWNIX vs. TBGVX — Risk / Return Rank
HWNIX
TBGVX
HWNIX vs. TBGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley International Value Fund (HWNIX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWNIX | TBGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 1.58 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.31 | 2.13 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 1.74 | +0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 6.58 | +2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWNIX | TBGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.58 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.72 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.61 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.73 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWNIX and TBGVX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWNIX vs. TBGVX - Dividend Comparison
HWNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.61%, more than TBGVX's 11.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWNIX Hotchkis & Wiley International Value Fund | 16.61% | 16.90% | 13.76% | 8.40% | 3.20% | 1.46% | 1.21% | 3.77% | 7.96% | 5.89% | 3.90% | 0.00% |
TBGVX Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund | 11.71% | 12.11% | 9.95% | 4.55% | 5.68% | 8.89% | 0.94% | 1.88% | 6.74% | 1.10% | 3.16% | 4.94% |
Drawdowns
HWNIX vs. TBGVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWNIX drawdown since its inception was -48.97%, roughly equal to the maximum TBGVX drawdown of -50.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWNIX and TBGVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWNIX | TBGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.97% | -50.97% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -9.56% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.23% | -17.71% | -11.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.97% | -31.18% | -17.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.39% | -7.46% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.09% | -6.09% | -2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.66% | +0.40% |
Volatility
HWNIX vs. TBGVX - Volatility Comparison
Hotchkis & Wiley International Value Fund (HWNIX) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) at 4.70%. This indicates that HWNIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWNIX | TBGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 4.70% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.57% | 7.39% | +3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.84% | 12.36% | +4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 11.03% | +6.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 12.64% | +7.30% |