PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWNIX vs. RWIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWNIX vs. RWIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley International Value Fund (HWNIX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWNIX achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly higher than RWIIX's 4.86% return.


HWNIX

1D
-1.36%
1M
0.33%
YTD
11.82%
6M
12.07%
1Y
27.30%
3Y*
23.16%
5Y*
14.19%
10Y*
11.68%

RWIIX

1D
-2.44%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
4.86%
6M
5.02%
1Y
15.67%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
0.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWNIX vs. RWIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWNIX
Hotchkis & Wiley International Value Fund
11.82%41.40%5.92%22.98%-5.40%18.12%-2.36%20.53%-18.77%0.59%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
4.86%7.87%-6.03%9.07%-11.57%10.68%14.57%4.58%-2.46%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between HWNIX and RWIIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2017

0.54

The correlation between HWNIX and RWIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWNIX vs. RWIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWNIX
HWNIX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HWNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
HWNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

RWIIX
RWIIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
RWIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
RWIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWNIX vs. RWIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley International Value Fund (HWNIX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HWNIXRWIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

2.51

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.63

6.50

+3.13

HWNIX vs. RWIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWNIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the RWIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWNIX and RWIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HWNIX vs. RWIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWNIX drawdown since its inception was -48.97%, which is greater than RWIIX's maximum drawdown of -20.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWNIX and RWIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWNIXRWIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.97%

-20.34%

-28.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-6.94%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.93%

-20.34%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.23%

-20.34%

-8.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

-4.76%

+2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-7.78%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.67%

+0.34%

Volatility

HWNIX vs. RWIIX - Volatility Comparison

Hotchkis & Wiley International Value Fund (HWNIX) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) at 4.78%. This indicates that HWNIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWNIXRWIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

4.78%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

9.42%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.90%

11.77%

+3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.87%

11.68%

+6.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.74%

10.98%

+8.76%

HWNIX vs. RWIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWNIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than RWIIX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWNIX vs. RWIIX - Dividend Comparison

HWNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.11%, more than RWIIX's 8.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HWNIX
Hotchkis & Wiley International Value Fund
15.11%16.90%13.76%8.40%3.20%1.46%1.21%3.77%7.96%5.89%3.90%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
8.33%8.74%0.00%6.82%1.72%14.15%6.51%1.84%0.86%0.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWNIX and RWIIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HWNIX has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to RWIIX (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWNIX dropped -48.97% vs RWIIX's -20.34%.

HWNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWNIX and RWIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer