HWMIX vs. FDVLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX).
HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997. FDVLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 1, 1978.
Performance
HWMIX vs. FDVLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWMIX vs. FDVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 6.74% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 7.69% |
FDVLX Fidelity Value Fund | 3.85% | 11.32% | 30.11% | 19.57% | -9.07% | 35.30% | 9.33% | 31.68% | -17.58% | 14.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWMIX achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly higher than FDVLX's 3.85% return. Over the past 10 years, HWMIX has underperformed FDVLX with an annualized return of 9.08%, while FDVLX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.94% annualized return.
HWMIX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
FDVLX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- 3.85%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 20.01%
- 3Y*
- 21.06%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWMIX vs. FDVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWMIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVLX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWMIX vs. FDVLX — Risk / Return Rank
HWMIX
FDVLX
HWMIX vs. FDVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWMIX | FDVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 1.01 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.54 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 1.48 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 6.01 | -0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWMIX | FDVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 1.01 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.49 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.52 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.56 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWMIX and FDVLX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWMIX vs. FDVLX - Dividend Comparison
HWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than FDVLX's 9.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.31% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
FDVLX Fidelity Value Fund | 9.68% | 10.05% | 33.05% | 3.71% | 7.08% | 9.79% | 0.98% | 3.34% | 16.25% | 3.38% | 1.26% | 10.97% |
Drawdowns
HWMIX vs. FDVLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWMIX drawdown since its inception was -69.84%, roughly equal to the maximum FDVLX drawdown of -66.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWMIX and FDVLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWMIX | FDVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.84% | -66.91% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.87% | -9.90% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.90% | -31.45% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -48.66% | -14.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -6.78% | +3.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -9.05% | -1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 3.68% | +0.47% |
Volatility
HWMIX vs. FDVLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) is 4.30%, while Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that HWMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWMIX | FDVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 6.14% | -1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 12.00% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.86% | 21.64% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 26.56% | -4.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.62% | 25.16% | +0.46% |