PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWCIX vs. SMVLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWCIX vs. SMVLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund (HWCIX) and Smead Value Fund (SMVLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWCIX achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly lower than SMVLX's 13.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HWCIX having a 12.66% annualized return and SMVLX not far behind at 12.13%.


HWCIX

1D
0.34%
1M
3.87%
YTD
8.96%
6M
11.78%
1Y
24.23%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
12.66%

SMVLX

1D
0.61%
1M
0.39%
YTD
13.63%
6M
11.21%
1Y
28.87%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
12.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWCIX vs. SMVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWCIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund
8.96%17.09%12.80%19.01%-4.35%32.46%0.42%29.30%-14.74%18.37%
SMVLX
Smead Value Fund
13.63%5.05%4.78%16.87%-2.79%42.46%1.71%26.29%-4.79%19.73%

Correlation

The correlation between HWCIX and SMVLX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.88

The correlation between HWCIX and SMVLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWCIX vs. SMVLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWCIX
HWCIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
HWCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
HWCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SMVLX
SMVLX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SMVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SMVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWCIX vs. SMVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund (HWCIX) and Smead Value Fund (SMVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HWCIXSMVLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.38

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

5.20

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.71

15.13

-2.42

HWCIX vs. SMVLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the SMVLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWCIX and SMVLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HWCIXSMVLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.17

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.52

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.63

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.70

-0.30

Drawdowns

HWCIX vs. SMVLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWCIX drawdown since its inception was -69.74%, which is greater than SMVLX's maximum drawdown of -39.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWCIX and SMVLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWCIXSMVLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.74%

-39.56%

-30.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.33%

-5.90%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.52%

-24.62%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.62%

-24.62%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.31%

-39.56%

-7.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.64%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.35%

-4.59%

-7.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.03%

-0.01%

Volatility

HWCIX vs. SMVLX - Volatility Comparison

Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund (HWCIX) and Smead Value Fund (SMVLX) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWCIXSMVLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.85%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

8.94%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

14.15%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.11%

18.36%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.63%

19.47%

+2.16%

HWCIX vs. SMVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWCIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than SMVLX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWCIX vs. SMVLX - Dividend Comparison

HWCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.23%, more than SMVLX's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HWCIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund
10.23%11.15%13.85%1.56%1.12%1.10%1.99%1.82%1.62%1.82%5.17%1.49%
SMVLX
Smead Value Fund
1.47%1.67%1.08%1.34%1.78%3.91%1.40%3.83%7.47%0.22%3.14%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWCIX and SMVLX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMVLX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to HWCIX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWCIX dropped -69.74% vs SMVLX's -39.56%.

SMVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWCIX and SMVLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer