PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWCIX vs. FLCOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWCIX vs. FLCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund (HWCIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWCIX achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly lower than FLCOX's 16.67% return.


HWCIX

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
5.13%
6M
4.64%
1Y
19.13%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
12.91%

FLCOX

1D
0.58%
1M
3.43%
YTD
16.67%
6M
15.94%
1Y
29.78%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWCIX vs. FLCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWCIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund
5.13%17.09%12.80%19.01%-4.35%32.46%0.42%29.30%-14.74%18.37%
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
16.67%15.90%14.38%11.48%-7.57%25.09%2.87%26.54%-8.38%10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between HWCIX and FLCOX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.92

The correlation between HWCIX and FLCOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWCIX vs. FLCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWCIX
HWCIX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HWCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HWCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCOX
FLCOX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FLCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWCIX vs. FLCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund (HWCIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HWCIXFLCOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.49

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

4.55

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.35

18.96

-9.61

HWCIX vs. FLCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the FLCOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWCIX and FLCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HWCIX vs. FLCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWCIX drawdown since its inception was -69.74%, which is greater than FLCOX's maximum drawdown of -38.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWCIX and FLCOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWCIXFLCOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.74%

-38.28%

-31.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.33%

-6.80%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.52%

-15.60%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.62%

-19.00%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.19%

-0.08%

-4.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-4.43%

-7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.63%

+0.44%

Volatility

HWCIX vs. FLCOX - Volatility Comparison

Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund (HWCIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) have volatilities of 4.13% and 3.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWCIXFLCOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

3.98%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

8.65%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.14%

11.27%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.08%

14.86%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.62%

17.63%

+3.99%

HWCIX vs. FLCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWCIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCOX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWCIX vs. FLCOX - Dividend Comparison

HWCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.60%, more than FLCOX's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
1.30%1.51%1.92%1.99%2.01%1.55%2.28%3.82%2.79%0.60%0.00%0.00%
HWCIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund
10.60%11.15%13.85%1.56%1.12%1.10%1.99%1.82%1.62%1.82%5.17%1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWCIX and FLCOX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HWCIX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to FLCOX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWCIX dropped -69.74% vs FLCOX's -38.28%.

FLCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWCIX and FLCOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer