HWAY vs. SGVT
HWAY (Themes US Infrastructure ETF) and SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HWAY is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive United States Infrastructure Index, while SGVT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Charles Schwab. HWAY is passively managed, while SGVT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. HWAY charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for SGVT.
Performance
HWAY vs. SGVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWAY achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly higher than SGVT's 1.41% return.
HWAY
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 22.83%
- 6M
- 21.62%
- 1Y
- 42.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGVT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HWAY vs. SGVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HWAY Themes US Infrastructure ETF | 22.83% | 14.84% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 1.41% | 2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between HWAY and SGVT is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HWAY vs. SGVT — Risk / Return Rank
HWAY
SGVT
HWAY vs. SGVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) and Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWAY | SGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.17 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.03 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.51 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWAY | SGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 18.57 | -17.32 |
Drawdowns
HWAY vs. SGVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWAY drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, which is greater than SGVT's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWAY and SGVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWAY | SGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.96% | -0.03% | -25.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | 0.00% | -1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -0.00% | -5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | — | — |
Volatility
HWAY vs. SGVT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HWAY | SGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.75% | 0.20% | +19.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 0.20% | +22.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 0.20% | +22.22% |
HWAY vs. SGVT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWAY has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SGVT's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
HWAY vs. SGVT - Dividend Comparison
HWAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than SGVT's 3.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HWAY Themes US Infrastructure ETF | 1.05% | 1.29% | 0.22% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 3.12% | 1.73% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HWAY and SGVT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGVT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGVT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for HWAY.
SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.05% for HWAY.
HWAY is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SGVT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HWAY and 0.28% for SGVT.
Find the right allocation for HWAY and SGVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer