PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWAY vs. AGMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWAY vs. AGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) and Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWAY achieves a 22.94% return, which is significantly higher than AGMI's -5.79% return.


HWAY

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.03%
6M
12.94%
YTD
22.94%
1Y
32.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.86%

AGMI

1D
1.77%
1M
-3.98%
6M
-15.79%
YTD
-5.79%
1Y
79.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
52.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.45K$87.98K$154.46K
$22.82K$23.54K$29.88K

HWAY vs. AGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HWAY
Themes US Infrastructure ETF
22.94%19.99%4.42%
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF
-5.79%176.11%-0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between HWAY and AGMI is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024

0.28

The correlation between HWAY and AGMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HWAY vs. AGMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HWAY
AGMI

Industrials

77.9%

-

Basic Materials

20.9%
99.7%

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%

-

Energy

0.2%

-

Utilities

0.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Technology

0.0%
0.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

HWAY
77.9%
AGMI

-

Basic Materials

HWAY
20.9%
AGMI
99.7%

Consumer Cyclical

HWAY
0.5%
AGMI

-

Energy

HWAY
0.2%
AGMI

-

Utilities

HWAY
0.1%
AGMI

-

Consumer Defensive

HWAY
0.0%
AGMI

-

Technology

HWAY
0.0%
AGMI
0.1%

Communication Services

HWAY

-

AGMI

-

Financial Services

HWAY

-

AGMI
0.0%

Healthcare

HWAY

-

AGMI

-

Real Estate

HWAY

-

AGMI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWAY vs. AGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HWAY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AGMI
AGMI Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
AGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HWAY vs. AGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) and Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HWAYAGMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.24

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.98

4.55

+3.43

HWAY vs. AGMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the AGMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWAY and AGMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HWAY vs. AGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWAY drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, smaller than the maximum AGMI drawdown of -35.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWAY and AGMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWAYAGMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-35.67%

+9.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.63%

-35.67%

+23.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.57%

-32.01%

+27.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-10.70%

+5.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

17.50%

-13.77%

Volatility

HWAY vs. AGMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) is 4.71%, while Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) has a volatility of 12.91%. This indicates that HWAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWAYAGMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

12.91%

-8.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.68%

40.91%

-24.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.52%

53.00%

-32.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.22%

44.92%

-22.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.22%

44.92%

-22.70%

HWAY vs. AGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWAY has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AGMI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWAY vs. AGMI - Dividend Comparison

HWAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%.


PositionTTM20252024
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF
4.70%4.43%1.81%
HWAY
Themes US Infrastructure ETF
1.05%1.29%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWAY and AGMI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGMI has higher volatility (12.91%) compared to HWAY (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWAY dropped -25.96% vs AGMI's -35.67%.

On 1-year performance, AGMI leads with 79.34% vs 32.92% for HWAY. On fees, HWAY is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HWAY has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AGMI has performed better with a 79.34% return vs 32.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HWAY is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AGMI.

AGMI has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 1.05% for HWAY.

HWAY is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while AGMI is Silver. HWAY tracks Solactive United States Infrastructure Index, while AGMI tracks STOXX Global Silver Mining Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HWAY and 0.35% for AGMI.

AGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWAY and AGMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer