PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWAIX vs. BUFBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWAIX vs. BUFBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund (HWAIX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWAIX achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly lower than BUFBX's 9.13% return. Over the past 10 years, HWAIX has outperformed BUFBX with an annualized return of 13.44%, while BUFBX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.73% annualized return.


HWAIX

1D
-0.23%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
4.92%
6M
4.36%
1Y
13.25%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
10.76%
10Y*
13.44%

BUFBX

1D
0.87%
1M
-3.49%
YTD
9.13%
6M
8.70%
1Y
14.89%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWAIX vs. BUFBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWAIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund
4.92%14.56%11.59%26.74%-7.88%34.33%5.35%25.62%-11.01%13.82%
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
9.13%10.37%10.26%7.42%3.97%29.97%-2.27%18.76%-7.01%13.20%

Correlation

The correlation between HWAIX and BUFBX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between HWAIX and BUFBX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWAIX vs. BUFBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWAIX
HWAIX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
HWAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HWAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFBX
BUFBX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BUFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWAIX vs. BUFBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund (HWAIX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HWAIXBUFBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.28

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

3.40

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.77

11.79

-6.02

HWAIX vs. BUFBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the BUFBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWAIX and BUFBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HWAIX vs. BUFBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWAIX drawdown since its inception was -41.28%, roughly equal to the maximum BUFBX drawdown of -39.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWAIX and BUFBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWAIXBUFBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.28%

-39.78%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-4.45%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.28%

-12.85%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.87%

-14.67%

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.28%

-35.51%

-5.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.26%

-3.49%

-2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-4.72%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

1.28%

+1.19%

Volatility

HWAIX vs. BUFBX - Volatility Comparison

Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund (HWAIX) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) at 3.47%. This indicates that HWAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWAIXBUFBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

3.47%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

6.96%

+3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

9.21%

+4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.10%

13.40%

+4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.41%

15.59%

+3.82%

HWAIX vs. BUFBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWAIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFBX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWAIX vs. BUFBX - Dividend Comparison

HWAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than BUFBX's 8.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
8.35%9.10%3.77%3.48%4.16%5.57%3.33%2.73%6.01%5.49%2.39%3.67%
HWAIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund
3.51%3.69%10.07%8.39%2.54%13.72%2.52%2.35%11.39%3.19%2.22%17.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWAIX and BUFBX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HWAIX has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to BUFBX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWAIX dropped -41.28% vs BUFBX's -39.78%.

BUFBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWAIX and BUFBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer