PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HVST.AX vs. QOZ.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HVST.AX vs. QOZ.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

HVST.AX (Betashares Australian Dividend Harvester Active ETF) and QOZ.AX (BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HVST.AX is a Dividend fund actively managed by BetaShares, while QOZ.AX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index. HVST.AX is actively managed, while QOZ.AX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HVST.AX returned 2.51%/yr vs 8.91%/yr for QOZ.AX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure.

Performance

HVST.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Australian Dividend Harvester Active ETF (HVST.AX) and BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HVST.AX achieves a -0.74% return, which is significantly lower than QOZ.AX's 5.36% return. Over the past 10 years, HVST.AX has underperformed QOZ.AX with an annualized return of 2.51%, while QOZ.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.91% annualized return.

HVST.AX

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.37%
6M
-0.30%
YTD
-0.74%
1Y
0.11%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
2.51%

QOZ.AX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.89%
6M
4.91%
YTD
5.36%
1Y
14.79%
3Y*
11.72%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
8.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HVST.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HVST.AX
Betashares Australian Dividend Harvester Active ETF		-0.74%6.89%10.85%8.84%-3.51%8.41%-2.12%13.98%-6.21%-10.08%
QOZ.AX
BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF		5.36%14.57%8.09%8.49%3.17%17.17%-0.13%18.60%-5.96%9.73%

Correlation

The correlation between HVST.AX and QOZ.AX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2014

0.81

The correlation between HVST.AX and QOZ.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Betashares Australian Dividend Harvester Active ETF

BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF

Often compared with QOZ.AX:
QOZ.AX vs. A200.AXQOZ.AX vs. DHHF.AXQOZ.AX vs. TRET.LQOZ.AX vs. NDQ.AXQOZ.AX vs. ARMR.AXQOZ.AX vs. TRET.DE

Return for Risk

HVST.AX vs. QOZ.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HVST.AX
HVST.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
HVST.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HVST.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
HVST.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
HVST.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
HVST.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX
QOZ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HVST.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Australian Dividend Harvester Active ETF (HVST.AX) and BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

HVST.AXQOZ.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.06
1.32

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.18
1.85

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.23

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

1.82

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.17

4.58

-4.41

HVST.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HVST.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the QOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HVST.AX and QOZ.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HVST.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HVST.AX drawdown since its inception was -23.38%, smaller than the maximum QOZ.AX drawdown of -37.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HVST.AX and QOZ.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HVST.AXQOZ.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.38%

-37.05%

+13.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.23%

-8.60%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.07%

-13.67%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.71%

-14.87%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.92%

-37.05%

+18.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.62%

-3.17%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-4.61%

-4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.51%

3.44%

+1.07%

Volatility

HVST.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Australian Dividend Harvester Active ETF (HVST.AX) and BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX) have volatilities of 2.47% and 2.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HVST.AXQOZ.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

2.43%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

9.38%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

11.91%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.03%

12.87%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.15%

14.67%

-3.52%

Dividends

HVST.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Dividend Comparison

HVST.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than QOZ.AX's 2.26% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HVST.AX
Betashares Australian Dividend Harvester Active ETF		4.29%5.26%4.93%6.13%6.64%6.19%7.01%10.96%10.87%10.37%9.21%8.07%
QOZ.AX
BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF		2.26%2.07%2.42%2.75%4.97%3.96%3.30%6.45%4.28%1.82%3.62%6.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

HVST.AX and QOZ.AX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HVST.AX is categorized as Dividend, while QOZ.AX is Large Cap Value Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HVST.AX and QOZ.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer