HVAC vs. PRN

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

HVAC (AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF) and PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HVAC is a Industrials Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while PRN is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. HVAC is actively managed, while PRN is passively managed. Over the past year, HVAC returned 28.95% vs 43.53% for PRN. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HVAC charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PRN.

Performance

HVAC vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HVAC achieves a 19.43% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 28.56% return.

HVAC

• 1D: -2.51%
• 1M: -7.68%
• 6M: 11.79%
• YTD: 19.43%
• 1Y: 28.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRN

• 1D: -2.58%
• 1M: -8.24%
• 6M: 18.73%
• YTD: 28.56%
• 1Y: 43.53%
• 3Y*: 28.59%
• 5Y*: 18.48%
• 10Y*: 16.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HVAC vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HVAC AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF	19.43%	23.15%
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	28.56%	12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between HVAC and PRN is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025	0.92

The correlation between HVAC and PRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

HVAC vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HVAC	PRN
Industrials	69.4%	65.7%
Technology	20.2%	22.7%
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	1.5%
Utilities	3.0%	-
Real Estate	2.8%	2.0%
Basic Materials	-	1.8%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	1.6%
Financial Services	-	1.2%
Healthcare	-	-

Return for Risk

HVAC vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HVAC

HVAC Risk / Return Rank: 37
HVAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
HVAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
HVAC Omega Ratio Rank: 31
HVAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
HVAC Martin Ratio Rank: 45

PRN

PRN Risk / Return Rank: 56
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HVAC vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HVAC	PRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	1.36	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	1.86	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.24	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	3.01	-1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.92	9.10	-3.18

HVAC vs. PRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HVAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the PRN Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HVAC and PRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HVAC vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HVAC drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, smaller than the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HVAC and PRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	HVAC	PRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.22%	-59.88%	+38.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.83%	-14.55%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.78%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.84%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.42%	-14.55%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-10.81%	+6.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.91%	4.80%	+0.11%

Volatility

HVAC vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC) has a higher volatility of 15.35% compared to Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) at 13.86%. This indicates that HVAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HVAC	PRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.35%	13.86%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.21%	26.01%	+1.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.74%	32.16%	-0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.52%	25.80%	+5.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.52%	24.58%	+6.94%

HVAC vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

HVAC has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

HVAC vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

HVAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, more than PRN's 0.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HVAC AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF	0.16%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	0.09%	0.17%	0.39%	0.52%	0.82%	0.11%	0.10%	0.42%	0.29%	0.60%	0.57%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HVAC and PRN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, HVAC and PRN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HVAC or PRN?

HVAC has higher volatility (15.35%) compared to PRN (13.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HVAC dropped -21.22% vs PRN's -59.88%.

Which ETF is better, HVAC or PRN?

On 1-year performance, PRN leads with 43.53% vs 28.95% for HVAC. On fees, PRN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PRN has been the lower-risk option at 13.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HVAC or PRN?

Over the 1-year period, PRN has performed better with a 43.53% return vs 28.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HVAC or PRN?

PRN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for HVAC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HVAC or PRN?

HVAC has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.09% for PRN.

What is the main difference between HVAC and PRN?

HVAC is categorized as Industrials Equities, while PRN is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for HVAC and 0.60% for PRN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.