PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HVAC vs. MSOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HVAC vs. MSOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC) and AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HVAC achieves a 36.48% return, which is significantly higher than MSOS's 0.42% return.


HVAC

1D
1.91%
1M
6.24%
YTD
36.48%
6M
32.88%
1Y
59.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSOS

1D
-6.14%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
0.42%
6M
28.46%
1Y
99.16%
3Y*
-4.01%
5Y*
-35.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HVAC vs. MSOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HVAC and MSOS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025

0.23

HVAC vs. MSOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HVAC
MSOS

Industrials

67.0%
29.6%

Technology

16.9%

-

Utilities

7.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
17.8%

Real Estate

2.8%
50.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

2.5%

Industrials

HVAC
67.0%
MSOS
29.6%

Technology

HVAC
16.9%
MSOS

-

Utilities

HVAC
7.4%
MSOS

-

Consumer Cyclical

HVAC
4.5%
MSOS
17.8%

Real Estate

HVAC
2.8%
MSOS
50.2%

Basic Materials

HVAC

-

MSOS

-

Communication Services

HVAC

-

MSOS

-

Consumer Defensive

HVAC

-

MSOS

-

Energy

HVAC

-

MSOS

-

Financial Services

HVAC

-

MSOS

-

Healthcare

HVAC

-

MSOS
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HVAC vs. MSOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HVAC
HVAC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HVAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HVAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HVAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HVAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
HVAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

MSOS
MSOS Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MSOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSOS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MSOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSOS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HVAC vs. MSOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC) and AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HVACMSOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

1.88

+2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.29

3.58

+10.71

HVAC vs. MSOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HVAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the MSOS Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HVAC and MSOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HVACMSOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

0.89

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.67

-0.34

+2.01

Drawdowns

HVAC vs. MSOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HVAC drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, smaller than the maximum MSOS drawdown of -96.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HVAC and MSOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HVACMSOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.22%

-96.25%

+75.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.83%

-52.91%

+38.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-91.37%

+90.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-71.71%

+67.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

27.78%

-23.59%

Volatility

HVAC vs. MSOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC) is 11.09%, while AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) has a volatility of 20.45%. This indicates that HVAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HVACMSOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.09%

20.45%

-9.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.96%

80.61%

-57.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.43%

112.00%

-84.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.39%

77.81%

-48.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.39%

74.04%

-44.65%

HVAC vs. MSOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HVAC has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MSOS's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

HVAC vs. MSOS - Dividend Comparison

HVAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while MSOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HVAC
AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF
0.14%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


HVAC and MSOS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSOS has higher volatility (20.45%) compared to HVAC (11.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HVAC dropped -21.22% vs MSOS's -96.25%.

On 1-year performance, MSOS leads with 99.16% vs 59.65% for HVAC. On fees, MSOS is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, HVAC has been the lower-risk option at 11.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSOS has performed better with a 99.16% return vs 59.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSOS is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for HVAC.

HVAC has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for MSOS.

HVAC is categorized as Industrials Equities, while MSOS is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for HVAC and 0.74% for MSOS.

HVAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HVAC and MSOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer