HVAC vs. MSOS

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

HVAC (AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF) and MSOS (AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HVAC is a Industrials Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while MSOS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HVAC returned 28.95% vs 59.32% for MSOS. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HVAC charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for MSOS.

Performance

HVAC vs. MSOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC) and AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HVAC achieves a 19.43% return, which is significantly higher than MSOS's -0.42% return.

HVAC

• 1D: -2.51%
• 1M: -7.68%
• 6M: 11.79%
• YTD: 19.43%
• 1Y: 28.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSOS

• 1D: 4.68%
• 1M: -6.75%
• 6M: -6.37%
• YTD: -0.42%
• 1Y: 59.32%
• 3Y*: -7.82%
• 5Y*: -34.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HVAC vs. MSOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HVAC AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF	19.43%	23.15%
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF	-0.42%	38.82%

Correlation

The correlation between HVAC and MSOS is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025	0.19

HVAC vs. MSOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HVAC	MSOS
Industrials	69.4%	29.6%
Technology	20.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	17.8%
Utilities	3.0%	-
Real Estate	2.8%	50.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

HVAC vs. MSOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HVAC

HVAC Risk / Return Rank: 37
HVAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
HVAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
HVAC Omega Ratio Rank: 31
HVAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
HVAC Martin Ratio Rank: 45

MSOS

MSOS Risk / Return Rank: 29
MSOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MSOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
MSOS Omega Ratio Rank: 35
MSOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
MSOS Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HVAC vs. MSOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC) and AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HVAC	MSOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	0.53	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	1.66	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.19	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	1.13	+0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.92	2.05	+3.87

HVAC vs. MSOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HVAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the MSOS Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HVAC and MSOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HVAC vs. MSOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HVAC drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, smaller than the maximum MSOS drawdown of -96.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HVAC and MSOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HVAC	MSOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.22%	-96.25%	+75.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.83%	-52.91%	+38.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-81.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-94.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.42%	-91.44%	+77.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-72.04%	+67.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.91%	29.09%	-24.18%

Volatility

HVAC vs. MSOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC) is 15.35%, while AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) has a volatility of 16.90%. This indicates that HVAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HVAC	MSOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.35%	16.90%	-1.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.21%	57.21%	-30.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.74%	112.70%	-80.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.52%	78.34%	-46.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.52%	73.87%	-42.35%

HVAC vs. MSOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HVAC has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MSOS's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

HVAC vs. MSOS - Dividend Comparison

HVAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while MSOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HVAC AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF	0.16%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HVAC and MSOS in my portfolio?

HVAC and MSOS have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HVAC or MSOS?

MSOS has higher volatility (16.90%) compared to HVAC (15.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HVAC dropped -21.22% vs MSOS's -96.25%.

Which ETF is better, HVAC or MSOS?

On 1-year performance, MSOS leads with 59.32% vs 28.95% for HVAC. On fees, MSOS is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, HVAC has been the lower-risk option at 15.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HVAC or MSOS?

Over the 1-year period, MSOS has performed better with a 59.32% return vs 28.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HVAC or MSOS?

MSOS is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for HVAC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HVAC or MSOS?

HVAC has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for MSOS.

What is the main difference between HVAC and MSOS?

HVAC is categorized as Industrials Equities, while MSOS is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for HVAC and 0.74% for MSOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HVAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.