PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HUZ.TO vs. ZJG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

HUZ.TO vs. ZJG.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Silver ETF (HUZ.TO) and BMO Junior Gold Index ETF (ZJG.TO).

HUZ.TO and ZJG.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HUZ.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2009. ZJG.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones North America Select Junior Gold Index. It was launched on Jan 19, 2010. Both HUZ.TO and ZJG.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

HUZ.TO vs. ZJG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Silver ETF (HUZ.TO) and BMO Junior Gold Index ETF (ZJG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HUZ.TO vs. ZJG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUZ.TO
Global X Silver ETF		5.72%129.20%18.72%-3.75%1.17%-15.10%39.27%12.48%-11.38%2.96%
ZJG.TO
BMO Junior Gold Index ETF		16.61%154.66%36.44%6.11%-0.89%-16.72%24.40%42.01%-18.76%11.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUZ.TO achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than ZJG.TO's 16.61% return. Over the past 10 years, HUZ.TO has underperformed ZJG.TO with an annualized return of 13.40%, while ZJG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.07% annualized return.

HUZ.TO

1D
-0.10%
1M
-16.40%
YTD
5.72%
6M
54.97%
1Y
108.04%
3Y*
40.34%
5Y*
20.53%
10Y*
13.40%

ZJG.TO

1D
3.98%
1M
-17.70%
YTD
16.61%
6M
31.55%
1Y
130.78%
3Y*
55.41%
5Y*
32.73%
10Y*
21.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Silver ETF

BMO Junior Gold Index ETF

Often compared with HUZ.TO:
HUZ.TO vs. HURA.TOHUZ.TO vs. SVR.TOHUZ.TO vs. SLVOHUZ.TO vs. AGCC.TOHUZ.TO vs. XGD.TOHUZ.TO vs. CGL-C.TOHUZ.TO vs. CASH.TO
Often compared with ZJG.TO:
ZJG.TO vs. SGDJZJG.TO vs. ZGD.TOZJG.TO vs. XGD.TOZJG.TO vs. ZGLD.TOZJG.TO vs. XMA.TOZJG.TO vs. RINGZJG.TO vs. KNT.TO

HUZ.TO vs. ZJG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUZ.TO has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ZJG.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.

HUZ.TO
Global X Silver ETF
ZJG.TO
BMO Junior Gold Index ETF

Return for Risk

HUZ.TO vs. ZJG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HUZ.TO
HUZ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HUZ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUZ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUZ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HUZ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUZ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
ZJG.TO
ZJG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ZJG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZJG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZJG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ZJG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZJG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUZ.TO vs. ZJG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver ETF (HUZ.TO) and BMO Junior Gold Index ETF (ZJG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HUZ.TOZJG.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

2.87

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.05

2.95

-0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.44

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

3.99

-1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.53

14.16

-6.63

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HUZ.TO vs. ZJG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUZ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the ZJG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUZ.TO and ZJG.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HUZ.TOZJG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.87

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.92

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.55

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.20

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between HUZ.TO and ZJG.TO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HUZ.TO vs. ZJG.TO - Dividend Comparison

HUZ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZJG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.

TTM20252024202320222021
HUZ.TO
Global X Silver ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZJG.TO
BMO Junior Gold Index ETF		0.10%0.12%0.68%0.90%0.83%0.36%

Drawdowns

HUZ.TO vs. ZJG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUZ.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.06%, roughly equal to the maximum ZJG.TO drawdown of -81.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUZ.TO and ZJG.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

HUZ.TOZJG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.06%

-81.59%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.11%

-32.02%

-11.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.11%

-41.63%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.84%

-48.58%

-0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.09%

-17.70%

-18.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.11%

-49.37%

-5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.04%

9.03%

+5.01%

Volatility

HUZ.TO vs. ZJG.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Silver ETF (HUZ.TO) and BMO Junior Gold Index ETF (ZJG.TO) have volatilities of 17.05% and 17.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

HUZ.TOZJG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.05%

17.74%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.43%

39.30%

+18.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.58%

45.80%

+11.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.47%

35.72%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.75%

38.48%

-5.73%