HUZ.TO vs. CGXF.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Silver ETF (HUZ.TO) and CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO).
HUZ.TO and CGXF.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HUZ.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2009. CGXF.TO is an actively managed fund by CI. It was launched on Mar 3, 2022.
Performance
HUZ.TO vs. CGXF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HUZ.TO vs. CGXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUZ.TO Global X Silver ETF | 5.82% | 129.20% | 18.72% | -3.75% | 1.17% | -15.10% | 39.27% | 12.48% | -11.38% | 2.96% |
CGXF.TO CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common | 6.89% | 114.19% | 11.88% | 1.43% | 1.89% | -6.21% | 15.23% | 20.53% | -18.76% | 5.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUZ.TO achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly lower than CGXF.TO's 6.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HUZ.TO having a 13.41% annualized return and CGXF.TO not far ahead at 13.49%.
HUZ.TO
- 1D
- 7.32%
- 1M
- -20.09%
- YTD
- 5.82%
- 6M
- 57.40%
- 1Y
- 105.90%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 20.56%
- 10Y*
- 13.41%
CGXF.TO
- 1D
- 6.44%
- 1M
- -17.38%
- YTD
- 6.89%
- 6M
- 18.28%
- 1Y
- 70.32%
- 3Y*
- 34.03%
- 5Y*
- 21.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HUZ.TO vs. CGXF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUZ.TO has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CGXF.TO's 1.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HUZ.TO vs. CGXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HUZ.TO
CGXF.TO
HUZ.TO vs. CGXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver ETF (HUZ.TO) and CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUZ.TO | CGXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 1.78 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 2.14 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 2.64 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.66 | 9.78 | -2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUZ.TO | CGXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.78 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.71 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.45 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.06 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between HUZ.TO and CGXF.TO is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HUZ.TO vs. CGXF.TO - Dividend Comparison
HUZ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.53%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUZ.TO Global X Silver ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CGXF.TO CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common | 9.53% | 7.43% | 8.09% | 8.92% | 8.54% | 8.59% | 11.01% | 6.69% | 7.97% | 6.99% | 10.68% | 11.75% |
Drawdowns
HUZ.TO vs. CGXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUZ.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.06%, smaller than the maximum CGXF.TO drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUZ.TO and CGXF.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUZ.TO | CGXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.06% | -88.66% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.11% | -27.39% | -15.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.11% | -37.19% | -5.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.84% | -39.68% | -9.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.03% | -17.38% | -18.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.11% | -30.85% | -24.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.90% | 7.40% | +6.50% |
Volatility
HUZ.TO vs. CGXF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Silver ETF (HUZ.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.07% compared to CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) at 16.05%. This indicates that HUZ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGXF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HUZ.TO | CGXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.07% | 16.05% | +3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.44% | 32.80% | +24.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.58% | 39.76% | +17.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.48% | 30.17% | +6.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.76% | 30.09% | +2.67% |