HUTS.TO vs. SDAY.NEO
HUTS.TO (Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF) and SDAY.NEO (Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUTS.TO is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canadian Utility Services High Dividend Index TR, while SDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton. HUTS.TO is passively managed, while SDAY.NEO is actively managed. Over the past year, HUTS.TO returned 24.80% vs 24.60% for SDAY.NEO. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HUTS.TO charges 2.06%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for SDAY.NEO.
Performance
HUTS.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUTS.TO achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly lower than SDAY.NEO's 18.92% return.
HUTS.TO
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- YTD
- 15.96%
- 1Y
- 24.80%
- 3Y*
- 16.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.66%
SDAY.NEO
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 10.82%
- YTD
- 18.92%
- 1Y
- 24.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$273.34K | CA$215.70K | CA$190.49K | |
| CA$178.72K | CA$76.59K | CA$26.37K |
HUTS.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HUTS.TO Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF | 15.96% | 9.96% |
SDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF | 18.92% | 4.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUTS.TO and SDAY.NEO is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUTS.TO vs. SDAY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
HUTS.TO
SDAY.NEO
HUTS.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF (HUTS.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF (SDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUTS.TO | SDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.35 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 3.22 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.54 | 10.02 | +1.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUTS.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUTS.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.57%, which is greater than SDAY.NEO's maximum drawdown of -7.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTS.TO and SDAY.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUTS.TO | SDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.57% | -7.75% | -22.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.87% | -7.75% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -0.64% | -3.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.73% | -1.77% | -7.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.48% | -0.33% |
Volatility
HUTS.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF (HUTS.TO) is 4.45%, while Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF (SDAY.NEO) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that HUTS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDAY.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUTS.TO | SDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 5.57% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.14% | 9.73% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.67% | 12.55% | -1.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 12.46% | +2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 12.46% | +2.52% |
HUTS.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUTS.TO has a 2.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SDAY.NEO's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUTS.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison
HUTS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, less than SDAY.NEO's 17.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUTS.TO Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF | 5.70% | 6.45% | 7.45% | 7.83% | 2.33% |
SDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF | 17.67% | 8.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUTS.TO and SDAY.NEO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SDAY.NEO is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDAY.NEO is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 2.06% for HUTS.TO.
HUTS.TO is categorized as Utilities Equities, while SDAY.NEO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 2.06% for HUTS.TO and 0.85% for SDAY.NEO.
Find the right allocation for HUTS.TO and SDAY.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer