HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO
HUTS.TO (Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF) and HHIC.TO (Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUTS.TO is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canadian Utility Services High Dividend Index TR, while HHIC.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by Harvest. HUTS.TO is passively managed, while HHIC.TO is actively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HUTS.TO charges 2.06%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HHIC.TO.
Performance
HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUTS.TO achieves a 20.32% return, which is significantly higher than HHIC.TO's 12.03% return.
HUTS.TO
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 20.32%
- 6M
- 21.83%
- 1Y
- 35.24%
- 3Y*
- 14.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HHIC.TO
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 12.03%
- 6M
- 13.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HUTS.TO Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF | 20.32% | 3.34% |
HHIC.TO Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF | 12.03% | 16.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUTS.TO and HHIC.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.07 |
HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HUTS.TO
HHIC.TO
Utilities
-
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
HUTS.TO
HHIC.TO
-
Energy
HUTS.TO
HHIC.TO
Communication Services
HUTS.TO
HHIC.TO
Basic Materials
HUTS.TO
-
HHIC.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HUTS.TO
-
HHIC.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
HUTS.TO
-
HHIC.TO
-
Financial Services
HUTS.TO
-
HHIC.TO
Healthcare
HUTS.TO
-
HHIC.TO
-
Industrials
HUTS.TO
-
HHIC.TO
-
Real Estate
HUTS.TO
-
HHIC.TO
-
Technology
HUTS.TO
-
HHIC.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HUTS.TO
HHIC.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF (HUTS.TO) and Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUTS.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.00 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUTS.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.57%, which is greater than HHIC.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTS.TO and HHIC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUTS.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.57% | -7.30% | -23.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -2.35% | +1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.99% | -1.52% | -8.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | — | — |
Volatility
HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUTS.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.58% | 16.93% | -7.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 16.93% | -1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 16.93% | -1.95% |
HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUTS.TO has a 2.06% expense ratio, which is higher than HHIC.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Dividend Comparison
HUTS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, less than HHIC.TO's 11.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHIC.TO Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF | 11.06% | 4.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HUTS.TO Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF | 5.43% | 6.45% | 7.45% | 7.83% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUTS.TO and HHIC.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HHIC.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HHIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 2.06% for HUTS.TO.
HUTS.TO is categorized as Utilities Equities, while HHIC.TO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 2.06% for HUTS.TO and 0.40% for HHIC.TO.
Find the right allocation for HUTS.TO and HHIC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer