PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF (HUTS.TO) and Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUTS.TO achieves a 20.32% return, which is significantly higher than HHIC.TO's 12.03% return.


HUTS.TO

1D
-0.73%
1M
4.35%
YTD
20.32%
6M
21.83%
1Y
35.24%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
10Y*

HHIC.TO

1D
0.93%
1M
2.73%
YTD
12.03%
6M
13.19%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HUTS.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF
20.32%3.34%
HHIC.TO
Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF
12.03%16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between HUTS.TO and HHIC.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.07

HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HUTS.TO
HHIC.TO

Utilities

41.3%

-

Energy

35.1%
34.8%

Communication Services

23.6%
10.2%

Basic Materials

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

32.7%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

11.0%

Utilities

HUTS.TO
41.3%
HHIC.TO

-

Energy

HUTS.TO
35.1%
HHIC.TO
34.8%

Communication Services

HUTS.TO
23.6%
HHIC.TO
10.2%

Basic Materials

HUTS.TO

-

HHIC.TO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

HUTS.TO

-

HHIC.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

HUTS.TO

-

HHIC.TO

-

Financial Services

HUTS.TO

-

HHIC.TO
32.7%

Healthcare

HUTS.TO

-

HHIC.TO

-

Industrials

HUTS.TO

-

HHIC.TO

-

Real Estate

HUTS.TO

-

HHIC.TO

-

Technology

HUTS.TO

-

HHIC.TO
11.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUTS.TO
HUTS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
HUTS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUTS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUTS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
HUTS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUTS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

HHIC.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF (HUTS.TO) and Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HUTS.TOHHIC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.00

HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTS.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.57%, which is greater than HHIC.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTS.TO and HHIC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUTS.TOHHIC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.57%

-7.30%

-23.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-2.35%

+1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.99%

-1.52%

-8.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

Volatility

HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUTS.TOHHIC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.58%

16.93%

-7.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.98%

16.93%

-1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.98%

16.93%

-1.95%

HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUTS.TO has a 2.06% expense ratio, which is higher than HHIC.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HUTS.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HUTS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, less than HHIC.TO's 11.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HHIC.TO
Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF
11.06%4.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUTS.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF
5.43%6.45%7.45%7.83%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


HUTS.TO and HHIC.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HHIC.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HHIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 2.06% for HUTS.TO.

HUTS.TO is categorized as Utilities Equities, while HHIC.TO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 2.06% for HUTS.TO and 0.40% for HHIC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUTS.TO and HHIC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer