HUTG vs. SSO
HUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both Leveraged Equities funds - HUTG tracks the Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) while SSO tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HUTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
HUTG vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HUTG
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 150.46%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSO
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 9.75%
- YTD
- 19.37%
- 6M
- 18.81%
- 1Y
- 52.69%
- 3Y*
- 37.56%
- 5Y*
- 19.62%
- 10Y*
- 24.21%
HUTG vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF | 180.22% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 15.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUTG and SSO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUTG vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
HUTG
SSO
HUTG vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF (HUTG) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUTG | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.18 | 0.42 | +5.76 |
Drawdowns
HUTG vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUTG drawdown since its inception was -66.30%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTG and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUTG | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.30% | -84.67% | +18.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -1.40% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.80% | -19.57% | -7.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.13% | — |
Volatility
HUTG vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUTG | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 220.40% | 23.60% | +196.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 220.40% | 33.65% | +186.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 220.40% | 35.89% | +184.51% |
HUTG vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUTG vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
HUTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.62% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUTG and SSO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.
SSO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for HUTG.
HUTG tracks Hut 8 Corp. (HUT), while SSO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUTG and 0.87% for SSO.
Find the right allocation for HUTG and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer