HUTG vs. SSO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both Leveraged Equities funds - HUTG tracks the Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) while SSO tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HUTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.

Performance

HUTG vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF (HUTG) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HUTG

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: 20.04%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SSO

• 1D: -2.86%
• 1M: -3.30%
• YTD: 12.95%
• 6M: 10.86%
• 1Y: 42.28%
• 3Y*: 33.83%
• 5Y*: 17.91%
• 10Y*: 24.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUTG vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF	114.72%
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500	8.89%

Correlation

The correlation between HUTG and SSO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026	0.64

Return for Risk

HUTG vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUTG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SSO

SSO Risk / Return Rank: 50
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUTG vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF (HUTG) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUTG	SSO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.71	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.24	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.34	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.90	—

Drawdowns

HUTG vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTG drawdown since its inception was -66.30%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTG and SSO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUTG	SSO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.30%	-84.67%	+18.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.17%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.21%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-46.73%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.12%	-6.70%	-16.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.46%	-19.53%	-6.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HUTG	SSO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.70%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.65%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	215.34%	24.92%	+190.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	215.34%	33.85%	+181.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	215.34%	35.93%	+179.41%

HUTG vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUTG vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

HUTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500	0.65%	0.68%	0.85%	0.18%	0.50%	0.18%	0.20%	0.50%	0.75%	0.39%	0.51%	0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUTG and SSO in my portfolio?

HUTG and SSO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HUTG or SSO?

On fees, HUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUTG or SSO?

HUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HUTG or SSO?

SSO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for HUTG.

What is the main difference between HUTG and SSO?

HUTG tracks Hut 8 Corp. (HUT), while SSO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUTG and 0.87% for SSO.