PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUTG vs. SSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HUTG vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF (HUTG) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HUTG

1D
-2.52%
1M
150.46%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SSO

1D
-1.40%
1M
9.75%
YTD
19.37%
6M
18.81%
1Y
52.69%
3Y*
37.56%
5Y*
19.62%
10Y*
24.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUTG vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HUTG and SSO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUTG vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUTG

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUTG vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF (HUTG) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HUTG vs. SSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HUTGSSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.18

0.42

+5.76

Drawdowns

HUTG vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTG drawdown since its inception was -66.30%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTG and SSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUTGSSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.30%

-84.67%

+18.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-1.40%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.80%

-19.57%

-7.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

Volatility

HUTG vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUTGSSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

220.40%

23.60%

+196.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

220.40%

33.65%

+186.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

220.40%

35.89%

+184.51%

HUTG vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

HUTG vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

HUTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HUTG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.62%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


HUTG and SSO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.

SSO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for HUTG.

HUTG tracks Hut 8 Corp. (HUT), while SSO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUTG and 0.87% for SSO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUTG and SSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer