HUTE.TO vs. TBIL.TO
HUTE.TO (Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF) and TBIL.TO (Harvest Canadian T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUTE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest, while TBIL.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HUTE.TO returned 19.83% vs 2.28% for TBIL.TO. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. HUTE.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for TBIL.TO.
Performance
HUTE.TO vs. TBIL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUTE.TO achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly higher than TBIL.TO's 0.83% return.
HUTE.TO
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 13.34%
- 1Y
- 19.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBIL.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 2.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HUTE.TO vs. TBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF | 13.26% | 19.04% | 15.48% |
TBIL.TO Harvest Canadian T-Bill ETF | 0.83% | 2.60% | 9.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUTE.TO and TBIL.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2024 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUTE.TO vs. TBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HUTE.TO
TBIL.TO
HUTE.TO vs. TBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) and Harvest Canadian T-Bill ETF (TBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUTE.TO | TBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 8.01 | -6.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 19.26 | -16.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 4.08 | -2.76 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.26 | 58.43 | -54.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.24 | 264.16 | -252.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUTE.TO | TBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 8.01 | -6.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 5.26 | -4.14 |
Drawdowns
HUTE.TO vs. TBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUTE.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.36%, which is greater than TBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTE.TO and TBIL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUTE.TO | TBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.36% | -0.38% | -17.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.57% | -0.04% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.73% | 0.00% | -3.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -0.00% | -3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 0.01% | +1.73% |
Volatility
HUTE.TO vs. TBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Harvest Canadian T-Bill ETF (TBIL.TO) at 0.04%. This indicates that HUTE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUTE.TO | TBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 0.04% | +4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 0.19% | +9.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.41% | 0.29% | +11.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.34% | 1.08% | +13.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.34% | 1.08% | +13.26% |
HUTE.TO vs. TBIL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUTE.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TBIL.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUTE.TO vs. TBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison
HUTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, more than TBIL.TO's 2.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF | 9.15% | 9.64% | 10.24% | 10.70% | 1.61% |
TBIL.TO Harvest Canadian T-Bill ETF | 2.27% | 2.57% | 8.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUTE.TO and TBIL.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TBIL.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TBIL.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HUTE.TO.
HUTE.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while TBIL.TO is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HUTE.TO and 0.00% for TBIL.TO.
Find the right allocation for HUTE.TO and TBIL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer