HUTE.TO vs. QQCI.TO

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

HUTE.TO (Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF) and QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUTE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest, while QQCI.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HUTE.TO returned 15.60% vs 29.39% for QQCI.TO. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. HUTE.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for QQCI.TO.

Performance

HUTE.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUTE.TO achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly lower than QQCI.TO's 16.78% return.

HUTE.TO

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 5.06%
• YTD: 11.73%
• 1Y: 15.60%
• 3Y*: 17.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.04%

QQCI.TO

• 1D: 4.27%
• 1M: -0.13%
• 6M: 16.86%
• YTD: 16.78%
• 1Y: 29.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF	CA$290.11K	CA$245.72K	CA$284.03K
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	CA$127.06K	CA$114.04K	CA$155.19K

HUTE.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF	11.73%	19.04%	3.48%
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	16.78%	12.64%	11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between HUTE.TO and QQCI.TO is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2024	-0.05

HUTE.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HUTE.TO	QQCI.TO
Utilities	40.5%	1.1%
Communication Services	40.3%	13.1%
Energy	15.8%	0.5%
Industrials	3.4%	2.7%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.3%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	3.6%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	60.9%

Return for Risk

HUTE.TO vs. QQCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HUTE.TO

HUTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 47
HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
HUTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
HUTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 42
HUTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
HUTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 48

QQCI.TO

QQCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 77
QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
QQCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
QQCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QQCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
QQCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HUTE.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUTE.TO	QQCI.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.92	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	2.68	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.34	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	3.48	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.16	11.50	-5.33

HUTE.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUTE.TO and QQCI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HUTE.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTE.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, roughly equal to the maximum QQCI.TO drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTE.TO and QQCI.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUTE.TO	QQCI.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.35%	-18.95%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.85%	-8.48%	+1.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.03%	-1.82%	-3.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-3.07%	-0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	2.56%	-0.02%

Volatility

HUTE.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) is 4.70%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that HUTE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUTE.TO	QQCI.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.70%	6.46%	-1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.00%	12.18%	-1.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.61%	15.41%	-2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.64%	16.18%	-1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.64%	16.18%	-1.54%

HUTE.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUTE.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQCI.TO's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUTE.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Dividend Comparison

HUTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.54%, more than QQCI.TO's 8.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF	9.54%	9.64%	10.24%	10.72%	1.61%
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	8.94%	9.34%	3.17%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUTE.TO and QQCI.TO in my portfolio?

HUTE.TO and QQCI.TO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HUTE.TO or QQCI.TO?

On fees, QQCI.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUTE.TO or QQCI.TO?

QQCI.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HUTE.TO.

What is the main difference between HUTE.TO and QQCI.TO?

HUTE.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQCI.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and CI. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HUTE.TO and 0.21% for QQCI.TO.