HUTE.TO vs. AVGY.TO
HUTE.TO (Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF) and AVGY.TO (Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds from Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HUTE.TO returned 19.83% vs 113.31% for AVGY.TO. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. HUTE.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for AVGY.TO.
Performance
HUTE.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUTE.TO achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly lower than AVGY.TO's 43.57% return.
HUTE.TO
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 13.34%
- 1Y
- 19.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGY.TO
- 1D
- 5.51%
- 1M
- 17.62%
- YTD
- 43.57%
- 6M
- 27.04%
- 1Y
- 113.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HUTE.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF | 13.26% | 14.23% |
AVGY.TO Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 43.57% | 83.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUTE.TO and AVGY.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUTE.TO vs. AVGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HUTE.TO
AVGY.TO
HUTE.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) and Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUTE.TO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 2.51 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 3.02 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.26 | 4.25 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.24 | 9.85 | +1.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUTE.TO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.51 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 2.32 | -1.20 |
Drawdowns
HUTE.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUTE.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.36%, smaller than the maximum AVGY.TO drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTE.TO and AVGY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUTE.TO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.36% | -28.78% | +10.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.57% | -28.50% | +23.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.73% | 0.00% | -3.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -8.45% | +4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 12.29% | -10.55% |
Volatility
HUTE.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) is 4.96%, while Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO) has a volatility of 13.40%. This indicates that HUTE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUTE.TO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 13.40% | -8.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 33.88% | -24.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.41% | 45.57% | -34.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.34% | 51.21% | -36.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.34% | 51.21% | -36.87% |
HUTE.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUTE.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGY.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUTE.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Dividend Comparison
HUTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, less than AVGY.TO's 18.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGY.TO Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 18.99% | 14.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF | 9.15% | 9.64% | 10.24% | 10.70% | 1.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUTE.TO and AVGY.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVGY.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVGY.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HUTE.TO.
Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HUTE.TO and 0.40% for AVGY.TO.
Find the right allocation for HUTE.TO and AVGY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer