HUT vs. NEM
HUT (Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock) and NEM (Newmont Corporation) are both stocks. HUT operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, HUT returned 42.61%/yr vs 10.33%/yr for NEM. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HUT vs. NEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUT achieves a 160.34% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's -0.43% return.
HUT
- 1D
- 6.56%
- 1M
- 21.47%
- YTD
- 160.34%
- 6M
- 178.59%
- 1Y
- 544.05%
- 3Y*
- 132.23%
- 5Y*
- 42.61%
- 10Y*
- —
NEM
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -14.84%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 91.07%
- 3Y*
- 36.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
HUT vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUT Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock | 160.34% | 124.21% | 53.60% | 213.88% | -89.17% | 185.45% | 250.63% | -25.02% | -70.92% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | -0.43% | 172.82% | -7.83% | -8.76% | -20.77% | 7.40% | 40.28% | 30.52% | -6.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUT and NEM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2018 | 0.15 |
The correlation between HUT and NEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HUT:
-$2.73
NEM:
$6.34
HUT:
-$40.96M
NEM:
$17.23B
HUT:
-$132.19M
NEM:
$8.97B
HUT:
-$306.16M
NEM:
$13.78B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUT vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank
HUT
NEM
HUT vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock (HUT) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUT | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.32 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.21 | 3.36 | +10.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.02 | 8.94 | +30.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUT | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.36 | 1.96 | +3.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.27 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.12 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
HUT vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUT drawdown since its inception was -95.04%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUT and NEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUT | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.04% | -81.30% | -13.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.62% | -27.25% | -11.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.68% | -36.57% | -35.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.04% | -62.40% | -32.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.09% | -24.65% | +14.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.67% | -41.38% | -22.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.04% | 10.22% | +3.82% |
Volatility
HUT vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison
Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock (HUT) has a higher volatility of 24.05% compared to Newmont Corporation (NEM) at 14.19%. This indicates that HUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUT | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.05% | 14.19% | +9.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.69% | 36.93% | +38.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.62% | 46.87% | +55.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.40% | 37.83% | +68.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.79% | 35.59% | +79.20% |
Dividends
HUT vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison
HUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUT Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | 1.03% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
Financials
HUT vs. NEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HUT and NEM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUT has higher volatility (24.05%) compared to NEM (14.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUT dropped -95.04% vs NEM's -81.30%.
HUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.36 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUT and NEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer