HUT vs. MTPLF
HUT (Hut 8 Corp.) and MTPLF (Metaplanet Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — HUT in Capital Markets, MTPLF in Asset Management. Over the past year, HUT returned 444.14% vs -80.25% for MTPLF. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HUT vs. MTPLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUT achieves a 134.28% return, which is significantly higher than MTPLF's -44.00% return.
HUT
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 10.80%
- 6M
- 92.78%
- YTD
- 134.28%
- 1Y
- 444.14%
- 3Y*
- 85.18%
- 5Y*
- 35.40%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 23.81%
MTPLF
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- 6M
- -50.53%
- YTD
- -44.00%
- 1Y
- -80.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -11.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
HUT Hut 8 Corp. | $525.36M | $446.23M | $513.46M |
MTPLF Metaplanet Inc | $1.04M | $889.48K | $1.63M |
HUT vs. MTPLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HUT Hut 8 Corp. | 134.28% | 124.21% | -20.95% |
MTPLF Metaplanet Inc | -44.00% | 8.70% | 33.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUT and MTPLF is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2024 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUT vs. MTPLF — Risk / Return Rank
HUT
MTPLF
HUT vs. MTPLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) and Metaplanet Inc (MTPLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUT | MTPLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.79 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.62 | -0.99 | +11.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.07 | -1.29 | +27.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUT vs. MTPLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUT drawdown since its inception was -95.04%, roughly equal to the maximum MTPLF drawdown of -92.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUT and MTPLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUT | MTPLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.04% | -92.05% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.62% | -82.82% | +44.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.09% | -90.88% | +71.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.83% | -59.75% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.71% | 65.33% | -49.62% |
Volatility
HUT vs. MTPLF - Volatility Comparison
Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) has a higher volatility of 37.29% compared to Metaplanet Inc (MTPLF) at 23.80%. This indicates that HUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTPLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUT | MTPLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.29% | 23.80% | +13.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.96% | 61.74% | +15.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.84% | 91.60% | +16.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.81% | 151.48% | -45.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.67% | 151.48% | -36.81% |
Dividends
HUT vs. MTPLF - Dividend Comparison
Neither HUT nor MTPLF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
HUT vs. MTPLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hut 8 Corp. and Metaplanet Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HUT and MTPLF have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUT has higher volatility (37.29%) compared to MTPLF (23.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUT dropped -95.04% vs MTPLF's -92.05%.
HUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUT and MTPLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer