PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUSIX vs. XTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HUSIX vs. XTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huber Small Cap Value Fund (HUSIX) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HUSIX vs. XTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HUSIX
Huber Small Cap Value Fund
-0.07%3.28%10.17%17.86%-4.92%1.11%
XTR
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF
-5.02%13.66%21.85%21.16%-17.67%4.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUSIX achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly higher than XTR's -5.02% return.


HUSIX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
4.23%
1Y
15.91%
3Y*
9.59%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
8.83%

XTR

1D
1.99%
1M
-5.39%
YTD
-5.02%
6M
-3.26%
1Y
13.41%
3Y*
14.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HUSIX vs. XTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XTR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HUSIX vs. XTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUSIX
HUSIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HUSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
HUSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

XTR
XTR Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUSIX vs. XTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huber Small Cap Value Fund (HUSIX) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUSIXXTRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

1.02

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

1.49

-0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.20

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

1.64

-0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.81

6.36

-3.55

HUSIX vs. XTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the XTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUSIX and XTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HUSIXXTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

1.02

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.51

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between HUSIX and XTR is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HUSIX vs. XTR - Dividend Comparison

HUSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than XTR's 18.76% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HUSIX
Huber Small Cap Value Fund
1.08%1.08%0.11%0.34%0.00%0.96%0.42%0.07%0.19%0.71%1.17%0.61%
XTR
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF
18.76%17.82%20.89%1.09%1.08%2.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HUSIX vs. XTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUSIX drawdown since its inception was -69.93%, which is greater than XTR's maximum drawdown of -20.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUSIX and XTR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HUSIXXTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.93%

-20.83%

-49.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.03%

-8.51%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.13%

-6.69%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.38%

-6.13%

-7.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

2.19%

+2.40%

Volatility

HUSIX vs. XTR - Volatility Comparison

Huber Small Cap Value Fund (HUSIX) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) have volatilities of 4.38% and 4.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HUSIXXTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

4.21%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.74%

8.28%

+5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.01%

13.16%

+9.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.42%

13.87%

+7.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.89%

13.87%

+10.02%