HURA vs. XBM.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about TuHURA Biosciences, Inc. (HURA) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO).
XBM.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Can Natural Resource NR CAD. It was launched on Apr 12, 2011.
Performance
HURA vs. XBM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HURA vs. XBM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HURA TuHURA Biosciences, Inc. | 114.09% | -81.50% | -31.10% | -97.54% | -72.98% | -60.16% | 85.51% | -79.82% | -68.63% | -65.82% |
XBM.TO iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF | 12.66% | 57.91% | -2.41% | 5.19% | -3.25% | 33.01% | 34.17% | 15.42% | -28.42% | 41.59% |
Different Trading Currencies
HURA is traded in USD, while XBM.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XBM.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HURA achieves a 114.09% return, which is significantly higher than XBM.TO's 9.45% return. Over the past 10 years, HURA has underperformed XBM.TO with an annualized return of -65.57%, while XBM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.72% annualized return.
HURA
- 1D
- -9.50%
- 1M
- 6.58%
- YTD
- 114.09%
- 6M
- -36.22%
- 1Y
- -44.33%
- 3Y*
- -76.42%
- 5Y*
- -78.11%
- 10Y*
- -65.57%
XBM.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -14.73%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 6M
- 28.67%
- 1Y
- 78.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 14.63%
- 10Y*
- 17.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HURA vs. XBM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HURA
XBM.TO
HURA vs. XBM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TuHURA Biosciences, Inc. (HURA) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HURA | XBM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | 2.00 | -2.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.25 | 2.49 | -2.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.35 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 3.38 | -3.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 12.63 | -13.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HURA | XBM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 | 2.00 | -2.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.56 | 0.41 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.51 | 0.50 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | 0.11 | -0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between HURA and XBM.TO is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HURA vs. XBM.TO - Dividend Comparison
HURA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XBM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HURA TuHURA Biosciences, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XBM.TO iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF | 0.75% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 2.09% | 4.83% | 3.01% | 1.81% | 3.71% | 3.43% | 1.63% | 2.42% | 5.70% |
Drawdowns
HURA vs. XBM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HURA drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than XBM.TO's maximum drawdown of -78.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HURA and XBM.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HURA | XBM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -67.40% | -32.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.60% | -23.88% | -65.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.99% | -40.57% | -59.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | -57.24% | -42.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -11.19% | -88.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.17% | -26.05% | -62.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.12% | 6.53% | +44.59% |
Volatility
HURA vs. XBM.TO - Volatility Comparison
TuHURA Biosciences, Inc. (HURA) has a higher volatility of 30.17% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO) at 15.22%. This indicates that HURA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HURA | XBM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.17% | 15.22% | +14.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.70% | 29.48% | +76.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 128.66% | 39.68% | +88.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 139.33% | 36.11% | +103.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 127.71% | 35.88% | +91.83% |