HURA vs. META
HURA (TuHURA Biosciences, Inc.) and META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) are both stocks. HURA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, HURA returned -66.00%/yr vs 17.60%/yr for META. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HURA vs. META - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HURA achieves a 258.13% return, which is significantly higher than META's -14.67% return. Over the past 10 years, HURA has underperformed META with an annualized return of -66.00%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.60% annualized return.
HURA
- 1D
- 5.45%
- 1M
- 8.40%
- YTD
- 258.13%
- 6M
- 232.35%
- 1Y
- 6.27%
- 3Y*
- -70.95%
- 5Y*
- -76.67%
- 10Y*
- -66.00%
META
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- YTD
- -14.67%
- 6M
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- -19.25%
- 3Y*
- 25.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 17.60%
HURA vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HURA TuHURA Biosciences, Inc. | 258.13% | -81.50% | -31.10% | -97.54% | -72.98% | -60.16% | 85.51% | -79.82% | -68.63% | -65.82% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -14.67% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between HURA and META is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2013 | 0.10 |
The correlation between HURA and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HURA:
-$0.62
META:
$27.47
HURA:
$0.00
META:
$214.96B
HURA:
-$17.64K
META:
$176.14B
HURA:
-$28.68M
META:
$106.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HURA vs. META — Risk / Return Rank
HURA
META
HURA vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TuHURA Biosciences, Inc. (HURA) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HURA | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.93 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | -0.58 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.15 | -1.16 | +1.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HURA vs. META - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HURA drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HURA and META.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HURA | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -76.74% | -23.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.46% | -33.30% | -53.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.76% | -34.15% | -65.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.99% | -76.74% | -23.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | -76.74% | -23.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -28.60% | -71.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.33% | -15.84% | -72.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.53% | 16.58% | +25.95% |
Volatility
HURA vs. META - Volatility Comparison
TuHURA Biosciences, Inc. (HURA) has a higher volatility of 24.04% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 12.90%. This indicates that HURA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HURA | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.04% | 12.90% | +11.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 99.64% | 27.85% | +71.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 135.13% | 36.18% | +98.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 140.73% | 44.18% | +96.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 128.37% | 38.76% | +89.61% |
Dividends
HURA vs. META - Dividend Comparison
HURA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HURA TuHURA Biosciences, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.38% | 0.32% | 0.34% |
Financials
HURA vs. META - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TuHURA Biosciences, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HURA and META have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HURA has higher volatility (24.04%) compared to META (12.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HURA dropped -100.00% vs META's -76.74%.
HURA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HURA and META
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer