HUMDX vs. RYSEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) and Royce Special Equity Fund (RYSEX).
HUMDX is managed by Huber Funds. It was launched on Dec 31, 2015. RYSEX is managed by Royce Investment Partners. It was launched on May 1, 1998.
Performance
HUMDX vs. RYSEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HUMDX vs. RYSEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMDX Huber Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.26% | 7.65% | 13.40% | 10.56% | -7.13% | 26.51% | -8.19% | 25.70% | -18.40% | 15.04% |
RYSEX Royce Special Equity Fund | 4.13% | 3.66% | 2.93% | 12.96% | -6.60% | 22.24% | 7.43% | 12.73% | -9.96% | 7.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUMDX achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than RYSEX's 4.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HUMDX having a 7.59% annualized return and RYSEX not far ahead at 7.66%.
HUMDX
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 8.06%
- 1Y
- 19.78%
- 3Y*
- 12.23%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
RYSEX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 6M
- 6.06%
- 1Y
- 17.87%
- 3Y*
- 6.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.40%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HUMDX vs. RYSEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUMDX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RYSEX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HUMDX vs. RYSEX — Risk / Return Rank
HUMDX
RYSEX
HUMDX vs. RYSEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) and Royce Special Equity Fund (RYSEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUMDX | RYSEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.03 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 1.61 | -0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 1.65 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 5.46 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUMDX | RYSEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.03 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.27 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.44 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.51 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between HUMDX and RYSEX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HUMDX vs. RYSEX - Dividend Comparison
HUMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than RYSEX's 11.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMDX Huber Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.75% | 0.76% | 1.02% | 1.14% | 2.01% | 0.95% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 1.16% | 0.61% | 2.34% | 0.00% |
RYSEX Royce Special Equity Fund | 11.87% | 12.36% | 16.35% | 5.32% | 12.34% | 16.53% | 3.70% | 11.56% | 13.11% | 8.24% | 7.72% | 11.68% |
Drawdowns
HUMDX vs. RYSEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUMDX drawdown since its inception was -50.39%, which is greater than RYSEX's maximum drawdown of -43.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMDX and RYSEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUMDX | RYSEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.39% | -43.25% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.19% | -10.97% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.16% | -23.03% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.39% | -32.13% | -18.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.28% | -5.62% | -1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.00% | -6.39% | -2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 3.32% | +0.85% |
Volatility
HUMDX vs. RYSEX - Volatility Comparison
Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Royce Special Equity Fund (RYSEX) at 3.54%. This indicates that HUMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYSEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HUMDX | RYSEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 3.54% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.94% | 9.66% | +3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.36% | 18.14% | +3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 16.43% | +4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.57% | 17.40% | +5.17% |