PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUMDX vs. PVCMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HUMDX vs. PVCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HUMDX vs. PVCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HUMDX
Huber Mid Cap Value Fund
0.34%7.65%13.40%10.56%-7.13%26.51%-8.19%11.63%
PVCMX
Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class
0.58%4.45%4.24%9.47%3.17%3.72%19.13%1.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMDX achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than PVCMX's 0.58% return.


HUMDX

1D
-0.78%
1M
-3.48%
YTD
0.34%
6M
5.78%
1Y
16.84%
3Y*
11.53%
5Y*
5.74%
10Y*
7.39%

PVCMX

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
0.58%
6M
1.23%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HUMDX vs. PVCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUMDX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PVCMX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HUMDX vs. PVCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUMDX
HUMDX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HUMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
HUMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

PVCMX
PVCMX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PVCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PVCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMDX vs. PVCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUMDXPVCMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

0.92

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.17

1.44

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.17

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

1.52

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.48

4.20

-0.72

HUMDX vs. PVCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUMDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the PVCMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUMDX and PVCMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HUMDXPVCMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.92

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.84

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

1.04

-0.74

Correlation

The correlation between HUMDX and PVCMX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HUMDX vs. PVCMX - Dividend Comparison

HUMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than PVCMX's 4.77% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HUMDX
Huber Mid Cap Value Fund
0.76%0.76%1.02%1.14%2.01%0.95%0.66%0.00%1.16%0.61%2.34%
PVCMX
Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class
4.77%4.80%6.95%4.84%2.30%1.98%2.70%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HUMDX vs. PVCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMDX drawdown since its inception was -50.39%, which is greater than PVCMX's maximum drawdown of -7.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMDX and PVCMX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HUMDXPVCMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.39%

-7.44%

-42.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.19%

-2.81%

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-7.44%

-17.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.03%

-1.85%

-7.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-1.29%

-7.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

1.02%

+3.13%

Volatility

HUMDX vs. PVCMX - Volatility Comparison

Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX) at 0.95%. This indicates that HUMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PVCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HUMDXPVCMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

0.95%

+3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

2.94%

+9.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.32%

4.75%

+16.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.58%

5.20%

+15.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.56%

6.37%

+16.19%