PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUMDX vs. PMJAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HUMDX vs. PMJAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) and PIMCO RAE US Small Fund Class A (PMJAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMDX achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly lower than PMJAX's 18.58% return. Over the past 10 years, HUMDX has underperformed PMJAX with an annualized return of 7.76%, while PMJAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.28% annualized return.


HUMDX

1D
-1.87%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
9.56%
6M
12.31%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
14.15%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
7.76%

PMJAX

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.79%
YTD
18.58%
6M
16.68%
1Y
36.10%
3Y*
21.64%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*
13.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMDX vs. PMJAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUMDX
Huber Mid Cap Value Fund
9.56%7.65%13.40%10.56%-7.13%26.51%-8.19%25.70%-18.40%15.04%
PMJAX
PIMCO RAE US Small Fund Class A
18.58%4.89%20.53%19.76%-5.07%38.48%6.52%19.76%-12.02%8.76%

Correlation

The correlation between HUMDX and PMJAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.87

The correlation between HUMDX and PMJAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUMDX vs. PMJAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUMDX
HUMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
HUMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
HUMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

PMJAX
PMJAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PMJAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMJAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMJAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PMJAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMJAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMDX vs. PMJAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) and PIMCO RAE US Small Fund Class A (PMJAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUMDXPMJAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

4.67

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.84

13.87

-5.02

HUMDX vs. PMJAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the PMJAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUMDX and PMJAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HUMDXPMJAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.09

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.26

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.40

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.41

-0.07

Drawdowns

HUMDX vs. PMJAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMDX drawdown since its inception was -50.39%, roughly equal to the maximum PMJAX drawdown of -50.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMDX and PMJAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUMDXPMJAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.39%

-50.53%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-7.66%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-26.72%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-50.53%

+25.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.39%

-50.53%

+0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.87%

-0.38%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.88%

-17.03%

+8.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.57%

+0.57%

Volatility

HUMDX vs. PMJAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) is 4.01%, while PIMCO RAE US Small Fund Class A (PMJAX) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that HUMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMJAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUMDXPMJAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

4.96%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

11.50%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.87%

17.16%

-1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.49%

40.26%

-19.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.54%

33.56%

-11.02%

HUMDX vs. PMJAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUMDX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PMJAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

HUMDX vs. PMJAX - Dividend Comparison

HUMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than PMJAX's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HUMDX
Huber Mid Cap Value Fund
0.70%0.76%1.02%1.14%2.01%0.95%0.66%0.00%1.16%0.61%2.34%
PMJAX
PIMCO RAE US Small Fund Class A
2.79%3.31%2.48%1.40%10.08%67.74%9.44%1.37%7.72%4.51%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


HUMDX and PMJAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PMJAX has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to HUMDX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUMDX dropped -50.39% vs PMJAX's -50.53%.

PMJAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUMDX and PMJAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer