HULC.TO vs. ZEQL.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HULC.TO (Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF) and ZEQL.TO (BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - HULC.TO tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index (CA NTR) while ZEQL.TO tracks the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HULC.TO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for ZEQL.TO.

Performance

HULC.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) (ZEQL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HULC.TO

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 7.49%
• YTD: 12.50%
• 6M: 10.64%
• 1Y: 29.64%
• 3Y*: 24.34%
• 5Y*: 34.17%
• 10Y*: —

ZEQL.TO

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 6.20%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HULC.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HULC.TO Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF	12.01%
ZEQL.TO BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units)	7.44%

Correlation

The correlation between HULC.TO and ZEQL.TO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026	0.70

Return for Risk

HULC.TO vs. ZEQL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HULC.TO

HULC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 71
HULC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
HULC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
HULC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 75
HULC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
HULC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HULC.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) (ZEQL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HULC.TO	ZEQL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.23	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HULC.TO	ZEQL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	2.01	-1.26

Drawdowns

HULC.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HULC.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.94%, which is greater than ZEQL.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HULC.TO and ZEQL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HULC.TO	ZEQL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.94%	-6.12%	-17.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-0.58%	+0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-1.69%	-2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.43%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HULC.TO	ZEQL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.25%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.53%	12.92%	-0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.99%	12.92%	+34.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.82%	12.92%	+30.90%

HULC.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HULC.TO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEQL.TO's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HULC.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Dividend Comparison

HULC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZEQL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.

Position	TTM
HULC.TO Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF	0.00%
ZEQL.TO BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units)	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HULC.TO and ZEQL.TO in my portfolio?

HULC.TO and ZEQL.TO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HULC.TO or ZEQL.TO?

On fees, ZEQL.TO is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HULC.TO or ZEQL.TO?

ZEQL.TO is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for HULC.TO.

What is the main difference between HULC.TO and ZEQL.TO?

HULC.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap Index (CA NTR), while ZEQL.TO tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HULC.TO and 0.05% for ZEQL.TO.