HUKX.L vs. HTWN.L
HUKX.L (HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP) and HTWN.L (HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - HUKX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while HTWN.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HUKX.L returned 9.07%/yr vs 23.33%/yr for HTWN.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HUKX.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HTWN.L.
Performance
HUKX.L vs. HTWN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUKX.L achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly lower than HTWN.L's 67.79% return. Over the past 10 years, HUKX.L has underperformed HTWN.L with an annualized return of 9.07%, while HTWN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 23.33% annualized return.
HUKX.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 5.71%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 20.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.07%
HTWN.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 12.18%
- YTD
- 67.79%
- 6M
- 70.49%
- 1Y
- 116.34%
- 3Y*
- 41.27%
- 5Y*
- 23.42%
- 10Y*
- 23.33%
HUKX.L vs. HTWN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUKX.L HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP | 5.71% | 26.20% | 9.58% | 7.36% | 5.07% | 17.54% | -11.64% | 17.42% | -8.67% | 12.39% |
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD | 67.79% | 23.15% | 27.50% | 21.28% | -20.57% | 29.44% | 31.41% | 29.56% | -2.68% | 15.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUKX.L and HTWN.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2011 | 0.31 |
HUKX.L vs. HTWN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HUKX.L
HTWN.L
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
Financial Services
HUKX.L
HTWN.L
Consumer Defensive
HUKX.L
HTWN.L
Industrials
HUKX.L
HTWN.L
Healthcare
HUKX.L
HTWN.L
Energy
HUKX.L
HTWN.L
-
Basic Materials
HUKX.L
HTWN.L
Utilities
HUKX.L
HTWN.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
HUKX.L
HTWN.L
Communication Services
HUKX.L
HTWN.L
Real Estate
HUKX.L
HTWN.L
-
Technology
HUKX.L
HTWN.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUKX.L vs. HTWN.L — Risk / Return Rank
HUKX.L
HTWN.L
HUKX.L vs. HTWN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUKX.L | HTWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.82 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 13.22 | -10.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.21 | 36.40 | -28.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUKX.L | HTWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 5.15 | -3.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 1.15 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 1.43 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 1.12 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
HUKX.L vs. HTWN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUKX.L drawdown since its inception was -34.22%, which is greater than HTWN.L's maximum drawdown of -31.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUKX.L and HTWN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUKX.L | HTWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.22% | -31.84% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -8.86% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.95% | -29.76% | +16.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.95% | -29.97% | +17.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.22% | -29.97% | -4.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.87% | -2.08% | -1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.37% | -7.18% | +2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.22% | -0.67% |
Volatility
HUKX.L vs. HTWN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) is 3.90%, while HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L) has a volatility of 9.73%. This indicates that HUKX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTWN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUKX.L | HTWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 9.73% | -5.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.43% | 18.35% | -8.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.82% | 22.75% | -11.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 20.88% | -8.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 23.42% | -8.46% |
HUKX.L vs. HTWN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUKX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HTWN.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUKX.L vs. HTWN.L - Dividend Comparison
HUKX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than HTWN.L's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD | 0.97% | 1.61% | 1.17% | 2.79% | 3.04% | 1.11% | 1.79% | 2.12% | 2.55% | 2.04% | 2.32% | 2.61% |
HUKX.L HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP | 2.85% | 2.95% | 3.74% | 3.50% | 3.63% | 3.19% | 4.04% | 4.31% | 4.35% | 3.79% | 3.49% | 3.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUKX.L and HTWN.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HUKX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HUKX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HTWN.L.
HUKX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while HTWN.L is Asia Pacific Equities. HUKX.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while HTWN.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for HUKX.L and 0.50% for HTWN.L.
Find the right allocation for HUKX.L and HTWN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer