PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUKX.L vs. HMUD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HUKX.L vs. HMUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) and HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HUKX.L is traded in GBp, while HMUD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HMUD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUKX.L achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly lower than HMUD.L's 9.40% return. Over the past 10 years, HUKX.L has underperformed HMUD.L with an annualized return of 9.07%, while HMUD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.45% annualized return.


HUKX.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
5.71%
6M
8.70%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
14.79%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
9.07%

HMUD.L

1D
0.81%
1M
5.73%
YTD
9.40%
6M
8.96%
1Y
23.25%
3Y*
17.49%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
15.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUKX.L vs. HMUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP
5.71%26.20%9.58%7.36%5.07%17.54%-11.64%17.42%-8.67%12.39%
HMUD.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
9.37%5.78%27.24%21.09%-10.74%28.57%17.17%25.51%-0.13%11.05%

Correlation

The correlation between HUKX.L and HMUD.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2010

0.57

The correlation between HUKX.L and HMUD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUKX.L vs. HMUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUKX.L
HUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

HMUD.L
HMUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUKX.L vs. HMUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) and HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUKX.LHMUD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

3.41

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.21

12.02

-3.82

HUKX.L vs. HMUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUKX.L and HMUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HUKX.LHMUD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

2.04

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.87

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.93

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.95

-0.42

Drawdowns

HUKX.L vs. HMUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUKX.L drawdown since its inception was -34.22%, which is greater than HMUD.L's maximum drawdown of -26.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUKX.L and HMUD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUKX.LHMUD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.22%

-26.43%

-7.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-6.80%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-21.51%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.95%

-21.51%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.22%

-26.43%

-7.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.87%

0.00%

-3.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-3.54%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

1.93%

+0.62%

Volatility

HUKX.L vs. HMUD.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) at 3.33%. This indicates that HUKX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUKX.LHMUD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

3.33%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

8.31%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.82%

11.33%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.65%

15.54%

-2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.96%

16.58%

-1.62%

HUKX.L vs. HMUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUKX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HMUD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

HUKX.L vs. HMUD.L - Dividend Comparison

HUKX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than HMUD.L's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMUD.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.91%0.95%0.82%0.97%1.07%0.78%1.11%1.22%1.45%1.24%1.43%1.43%
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP
2.85%2.95%3.74%3.50%3.63%3.19%4.04%4.31%4.35%3.79%3.49%3.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


HUKX.L and HMUD.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HUKX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HUKX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HMUD.L.

HUKX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while HMUD.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. HUKX.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while HMUD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for HUKX.L and 0.30% for HMUD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUKX.L and HMUD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer