PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HUKX.L vs. HMAF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HUKX.L vs. HMAF.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HUKX.L (HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP) and HMAF.L (HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - HUKX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while HMAF.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HUKX.L returned 9.07%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for HMAF.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HUKX.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HMAF.L.

Performance

HUKX.L vs. HMAF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) and HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMAF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HUKX.L is traded in GBp, while HMAF.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HMAF.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUKX.L achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly lower than HMAF.L's 36.25% return. Over the past 10 years, HUKX.L has underperformed HMAF.L with an annualized return of 9.07%, while HMAF.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.09% annualized return.

HUKX.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
5.71%
6M
8.70%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
14.79%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
9.07%

HMAF.L

1D
-2.32%
1M
8.81%
YTD
36.25%
6M
39.16%
1Y
73.09%
3Y*
25.41%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
12.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUKX.L vs. HMAF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP		5.71%26.20%9.58%7.36%5.07%17.54%-11.64%17.42%-8.67%12.39%
HMAF.L
HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD		36.25%31.76%13.79%-3.80%-12.60%-7.57%21.71%13.88%-10.05%29.41%

Correlation

The correlation between HUKX.L and HMAF.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2013

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between HUKX.L and HMAF.L has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HUKX.L vs. HMAF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HUKX.L
HMAF.L

Financial Services

26.2%
14.9%

Consumer Defensive

13.7%
1.6%

Industrials

13.0%
7.3%

Healthcare

12.9%
2.2%

Energy

10.7%
1.4%

Basic Materials

8.5%
2.4%

Utilities

4.8%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
9.3%

Communication Services

2.3%
6.5%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.6%

Technology

0.3%
51.5%

Financial Services

HUKX.L
26.2%
HMAF.L
14.9%

Consumer Defensive

HUKX.L
13.7%
HMAF.L
1.6%

Industrials

HUKX.L
13.0%
HMAF.L
7.3%

Healthcare

HUKX.L
12.9%
HMAF.L
2.2%

Energy

HUKX.L
10.7%
HMAF.L
1.4%

Basic Materials

HUKX.L
8.5%
HMAF.L
2.4%

Utilities

HUKX.L
4.8%
HMAF.L
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

HUKX.L
4.5%
HMAF.L
9.3%

Communication Services

HUKX.L
2.3%
HMAF.L
6.5%

Real Estate

HUKX.L
1.0%
HMAF.L
1.6%

Technology

HUKX.L
0.3%
HMAF.L
51.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP

HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD

Often compared with HUKX.L:
HUKX.L vs. ISF.LHUKX.L vs. VUKG.LHUKX.L vs. VFWAXHUKX.L vs. EUDVHUKX.L vs. LDUK.LHUKX.L vs. HSPD.LHUKX.L vs. LDEG.L
Often compared with HMAF.L:
HMAF.L vs. SPYHMAF.L vs. CP9G.LHMAF.L vs. HSTC.LHMAF.L vs. CP9U.LHMAF.L vs. H50E.LHMAF.L vs. FRIN.LHMAF.L vs. HMUD.L

Return for Risk

HUKX.L vs. HMAF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HUKX.L
HUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
HMAF.L
HMAF.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
HMAF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMAF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMAF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HMAF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMAF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUKX.L vs. HMAF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) and HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMAF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HUKX.LHMAF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.93
3.84

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.70
4.74

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.67

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

6.85

-4.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.21

22.75

-14.55

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HUKX.L vs. HMAF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the HMAF.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUKX.L and HMAF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HUKX.LHMAF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

3.84

-1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.49

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.64

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.54

-0.01

Drawdowns

HUKX.L vs. HMAF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUKX.L drawdown since its inception was -34.22%, smaller than the maximum HMAF.L drawdown of -39.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUKX.L and HMAF.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HUKX.LHMAF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.22%

-39.58%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-10.62%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-19.52%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.95%

-34.30%

+21.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.22%

-39.58%

+5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.87%

-3.05%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-12.55%

+8.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

3.20%

-0.65%

Volatility

HUKX.L vs. HMAF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) is 3.90%, while HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMAF.L) has a volatility of 8.65%. This indicates that HUKX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMAF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HUKX.LHMAF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

8.65%

-4.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

15.96%

-6.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.82%

18.95%

-8.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.65%

19.03%

-6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.96%

18.99%

-4.03%

HUKX.L vs. HMAF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUKX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HMAF.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUKX.L vs. HMAF.L - Dividend Comparison

HUKX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, while HMAF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMAF.L
HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.59%
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP		2.85%2.95%3.74%3.50%3.63%3.19%4.04%4.31%4.35%3.79%3.49%3.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

HUKX.L and HMAF.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HUKX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HUKX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HMAF.L.

HUKX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while HMAF.L is Asia Pacific Equities. HUKX.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while HMAF.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for HUKX.L and 0.45% for HMAF.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUKX.L and HMAF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer