PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUKX.L vs. 2B76.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HUKX.L vs. 2B76.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B76.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HUKX.L is traded in GBp, while 2B76.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 2B76.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUKX.L achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than 2B76.DE's 27.78% return.


HUKX.L

1D
1.47%
1M
0.89%
YTD
6.75%
6M
9.96%
1Y
21.59%
3Y*
15.17%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
9.82%

2B76.DE

1D
3.97%
1M
2.70%
YTD
27.78%
6M
27.31%
1Y
46.07%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUKX.L vs. 2B76.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP
6.75%26.20%9.58%7.36%5.07%17.54%-11.64%17.42%-8.67%12.39%
2B76.DE
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
27.78%9.94%7.23%32.31%-27.26%22.90%33.26%34.55%-14.33%34.94%

Correlation

The correlation between HUKX.L and 2B76.DE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between HUKX.L and 2B76.DE has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUKX.L vs. 2B76.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUKX.L
HUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

2B76.DE
2B76.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
2B76.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B76.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B76.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
2B76.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B76.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUKX.L vs. 2B76.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B76.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HUKX.L2B76.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

3.37

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.97

10.00

-2.03

HUKX.L vs. 2B76.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the 2B76.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUKX.L and 2B76.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HUKX.L vs. 2B76.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUKX.L drawdown since its inception was -34.22%, roughly equal to the maximum 2B76.DE drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUKX.L and 2B76.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUKX.L2B76.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.22%

-33.50%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-13.20%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-28.41%

+15.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.95%

-33.50%

+20.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

-1.21%

-1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-8.70%

+4.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

4.46%

-1.83%

Volatility

HUKX.L vs. 2B76.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) is 3.60%, while iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B76.DE) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that HUKX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B76.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUKX.L2B76.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

8.83%

-5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.63%

17.62%

-7.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.01%

21.82%

-10.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.67%

21.46%

-8.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.95%

21.98%

-7.03%

HUKX.L vs. 2B76.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUKX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B76.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HUKX.L vs. 2B76.DE - Dividend Comparison

HUKX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, while 2B76.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2B76.DE
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP
2.83%2.95%3.74%3.50%3.63%3.19%4.04%4.31%4.35%3.79%3.49%3.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


HUKX.L and 2B76.DE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HUKX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HUKX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 2B76.DE.

HUKX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while 2B76.DE is Robotics. HUKX.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while 2B76.DE tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for HUKX.L and 0.40% for 2B76.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUKX.L and 2B76.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer