HUG.TO vs. ZJG.TO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HUG.TO (Global X Gold ETF) and ZJG.TO (BMO Junior Gold Index ETF) are both Gold funds - HUG.TO tracks the Solactive Gold Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER while ZJG.TO tracks the Dow Jones North America Select Junior Gold Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HUG.TO returned 9.16%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for ZJG.TO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HUG.TO charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for ZJG.TO.

Performance

HUG.TO vs. ZJG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Gold ETF (HUG.TO) and BMO Junior Gold Index ETF (ZJG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUG.TO achieves a -6.22% return, which is significantly lower than ZJG.TO's -5.10% return. Over the past 10 years, HUG.TO has underperformed ZJG.TO with an annualized return of 9.16%, while ZJG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.76% annualized return.

HUG.TO

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: -8.80%
• YTD: -6.22%
• 6M: -10.32%
• 1Y: 17.58%
• 3Y*: 25.10%
• 5Y*: 15.48%
• 10Y*: 9.16%

ZJG.TO

• 1D: -4.57%
• 1M: -6.41%
• YTD: -5.10%
• 6M: -10.19%
• 1Y: 58.88%
• 3Y*: 51.52%
• 5Y*: 27.58%
• 10Y*: 13.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUG.TO vs. ZJG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HUG.TO Global X Gold ETF	-6.22%	57.93%	24.13%	11.48%	-1.87%	-5.30%	19.82%	15.86%	-4.52%	10.34%
ZJG.TO BMO Junior Gold Index ETF	-5.10%	154.66%	36.44%	6.11%	-0.89%	-16.72%	24.40%	42.04%	-18.77%	11.85%

Correlation

The correlation between HUG.TO and ZJG.TO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2010	0.58

Over the past year, HUG.TO and ZJG.TO have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.58, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

HUG.TO vs. ZJG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUG.TO

HUG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 19
HUG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
HUG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
HUG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 21
HUG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
HUG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 18

ZJG.TO

ZJG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 34
ZJG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
ZJG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
ZJG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 36
ZJG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ZJG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUG.TO vs. ZJG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold ETF (HUG.TO) and BMO Junior Gold Index ETF (ZJG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUG.TO	ZJG.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	1.21	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	1.65	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.23	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.70	1.58	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.84	3.99	-2.15

HUG.TO vs. ZJG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the ZJG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUG.TO and ZJG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HUG.TO vs. ZJG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUG.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.99%, smaller than the maximum ZJG.TO drawdown of -81.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUG.TO and ZJG.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUG.TO	ZJG.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.99%	-81.59%	+33.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.13%	-37.55%	+12.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.13%	-37.55%	+12.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.13%	-41.63%	+16.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.13%	-48.58%	+23.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.71%	-33.02%	+8.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.35%	-49.01%	+25.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.58%	14.80%	-5.22%

Volatility

HUG.TO vs. ZJG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Gold ETF (HUG.TO) is 8.18%, while BMO Junior Gold Index ETF (ZJG.TO) has a volatility of 17.64%. This indicates that HUG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZJG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUG.TO	ZJG.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.18%	17.64%	-9.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.96%	40.57%	-16.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.43%	48.74%	-21.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.52%	36.89%	-18.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.49%	38.21%	-21.72%

HUG.TO vs. ZJG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUG.TO has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than ZJG.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUG.TO vs. ZJG.TO - Dividend Comparison

HUG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZJG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HUG.TO Global X Gold ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZJG.TO BMO Junior Gold Index ETF	0.12%	0.12%	0.68%	0.90%	0.83%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUG.TO and ZJG.TO in my portfolio?

HUG.TO and ZJG.TO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HUG.TO or ZJG.TO?

On fees, HUG.TO is cheaper at 0.54% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUG.TO or ZJG.TO?

HUG.TO is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZJG.TO.

What is the main difference between HUG.TO and ZJG.TO?

HUG.TO tracks Solactive Gold Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER, while ZJG.TO tracks Dow Jones North America Select Junior Gold Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for HUG.TO and 0.61% for ZJG.TO.