HUG.TO vs. KILO.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Gold ETF (HUG.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO).
HUG.TO and KILO.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HUG.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Gold Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER. It was launched on Jun 24, 2009.
Performance
HUG.TO vs. KILO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HUG.TO vs. KILO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUG.TO Global X Gold ETF | 7.30% | 57.93% | 24.13% | 11.48% | -1.87% | -5.30% | 19.82% | 15.86% | 5.16% |
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | 8.08% | 60.17% | 25.97% | 12.15% | -0.90% | -4.72% | 22.91% | 18.86% | 2.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUG.TO achieves a 7.30% return, which is significantly lower than KILO.TO's 8.08% return.
HUG.TO
- 1D
- 3.60%
- 1M
- -11.44%
- YTD
- 7.30%
- 6M
- 18.79%
- 1Y
- 43.53%
- 3Y*
- 29.54%
- 5Y*
- 19.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
KILO.TO
- 1D
- 3.92%
- 1M
- -11.13%
- YTD
- 8.08%
- 6M
- 19.90%
- 1Y
- 45.80%
- 3Y*
- 31.34%
- 5Y*
- 20.61%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HUG.TO vs. KILO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
HUG.TO vs. KILO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HUG.TO
KILO.TO
HUG.TO vs. KILO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold ETF (HUG.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUG.TO | KILO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 1.67 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 2.13 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 2.45 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.51 | 9.04 | -0.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUG.TO | KILO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.67 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 1.17 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 1.10 | -0.64 |
Correlation
The correlation between HUG.TO and KILO.TO is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HUG.TO vs. KILO.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HUG.TO nor KILO.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUG.TO Global X Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% |
Drawdowns
HUG.TO vs. KILO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUG.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.99%, which is greater than KILO.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUG.TO and KILO.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUG.TO | KILO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.99% | -22.67% | -25.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.27% | -19.62% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.06% | -21.31% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.85% | -13.50% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.04% | -7.02% | -16.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.35% | 5.31% | +0.04% |
Volatility
HUG.TO vs. KILO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Gold ETF (HUG.TO) is 10.58%, while Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) has a volatility of 11.21%. This indicates that HUG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KILO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HUG.TO | KILO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.58% | 11.21% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.01% | 23.93% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.70% | 27.59% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 17.66% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 18.04% | -1.66% |