HUDIX vs. PSECX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HUDIX (Huber Large Cap Value Fund) and PSECX (1789 Growth and Income Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HUDIX returned 10.56%/yr vs 7.28%/yr for PSECX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HUDIX charges 1.15%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for PSECX.

Performance

HUDIX vs. PSECX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huber Large Cap Value Fund (HUDIX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUDIX achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly higher than PSECX's 3.23% return. Over the past 10 years, HUDIX has outperformed PSECX with an annualized return of 10.56%, while PSECX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.28% annualized return.

HUDIX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: 5.97%
• 6M: 7.38%
• 1Y: 18.92%
• 3Y*: 15.75%
• 5Y*: 9.83%
• 10Y*: 10.56%

PSECX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -0.66%
• YTD: 3.23%
• 6M: 2.17%
• 1Y: 8.22%
• 3Y*: 11.87%
• 5Y*: 7.00%
• 10Y*: 7.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUDIX vs. PSECX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HUDIX Huber Large Cap Value Fund	5.97%	10.58%	21.95%	10.85%	-2.96%	23.20%	-3.50%	30.44%	-13.48%	21.24%
PSECX 1789 Growth and Income Fund	3.23%	8.04%	14.49%	10.64%	-10.66%	25.43%	0.78%	23.99%	-5.18%	5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between HUDIX and PSECX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2013	0.80

The correlation between HUDIX and PSECX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HUDIX vs. PSECX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUDIX

HUDIX Risk / Return Rank: 47
HUDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
HUDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
HUDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
HUDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
HUDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

PSECX

PSECX Risk / Return Rank: 12
PSECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
PSECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
PSECX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
PSECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
PSECX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUDIX vs. PSECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huber Large Cap Value Fund (HUDIX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HUDIX	PSECX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	0.87	+0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	1.30	+1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.15	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	1.15	+2.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.05	4.26	+6.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HUDIX vs. PSECX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUDIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the PSECX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUDIX and PSECX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HUDIX	PSECX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75	0.87	+0.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.59	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.55	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.56	+0.01

Drawdowns

HUDIX vs. PSECX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUDIX drawdown since its inception was -37.14%, which is greater than PSECX's maximum drawdown of -31.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUDIX and PSECX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUDIX	PSECX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.14%	-31.13%	-6.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.13%	-7.44%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.86%	-12.51%	-6.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.86%	-18.47%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.14%	-31.13%	-6.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-2.49%	+2.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-3.88%	-0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	2.00%	-0.18%

Volatility

HUDIX vs. PSECX - Volatility Comparison

Huber Large Cap Value Fund (HUDIX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) have volatilities of 2.71% and 2.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUDIX	PSECX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.71%	2.71%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.37%	7.71%	+0.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.49%	9.89%	+1.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.16%	11.94%	+4.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.50%	13.20%	+5.30%

HUDIX vs. PSECX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUDIX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PSECX's 2.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUDIX vs. PSECX - Dividend Comparison

HUDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than PSECX's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HUDIX Huber Large Cap Value Fund	1.03%	1.10%	1.09%	1.50%	1.40%	1.14%	1.48%	1.16%	1.53%	1.44%	1.57%	1.28%
PSECX 1789 Growth and Income Fund	0.98%	0.85%	3.88%	2.71%	4.60%	1.53%	0.27%	1.16%	6.78%	0.59%	0.31%	5.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUDIX and PSECX in my portfolio?

HUDIX and PSECX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HUDIX or PSECX?

PSECX has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to HUDIX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUDIX dropped -37.14% vs PSECX's -31.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HUDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.